[Linux-ham] Congrats!

[Jeremy Portzer]

--=-OgY1ofe1w+AqgNNDHWow
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The maximum rate it mentioned was 9600 baud, I believe.  About good
enough for IRC and email without attachments, maybe.

But someone else I was talking to at the hamfest said there are plans to
improve the bandwidth... but because the frequencies that it uses are
fairly low, there's just not a lot of bandwidth available.

--Jeremy

On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 14:34, Jim Ray wrote:
> does "now you're talking" provide any bandwidth spec attained with
> IPoHAM?
>=20
> 	-----Original Message-----=20
> 	From: Jeremy Portzer [mailto:jeremyp@pobox.com]=20
> 	Sent: Tue 7/22/2003 2:17 PM=20
> 	To: linux-ham@trilug.org=20
> 	Cc:=20
> 	Subject: Re: [Linux-ham] Congrats!
> =09
> =09
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-ham mailing list
> Linux-ham@trilug.org
> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ham
--=20
/---------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Jeremy Portzer       jeremyp@pobox.com       trilug.org/~jeremy     |
| GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F  E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 |
\---------------------------------------------------------------------/

--=-OgY1ofe1w+AqgNNDHWow
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/HYRDb5/3vMwae5IRAkJzAKDd202TovBHhpMcmJqpgmy2Dg61sACg1PWO
SCLEY/4FOXBDtmsI/HZBtPQ=
=hje5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-OgY1ofe1w+AqgNNDHWow--