[RHCE] Low Price Tobacco

Mike Broome rhce@trilug.org
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 09:13:05 -0500


On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 09:04:04AM -0500, Jeremy Portzer wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 08:58, Mike Broome wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 08:52:11AM -0500, Rock Roskam wrote:
> > > Grrr! We have been pegged.
> > 
> > Gah!  Now how do we make it stop?
> > 
> > <*insert discussion of the possible steps and probable futility of
> > trying to stop spam in today's Internet environment*>
> > 
> > trilug.org is running SpamAssassain, but looking at the headers, it has
> > "X-Spam-Status: No, ..." so it wasn't thought to be spam.  Any way to
> > change its mind or smarten up SA?
> 
> My headers don't show that -- are you running SA on your own mail
> server?

Ah, got it.  SA isn't running on the box where I read my mail, but it is
running on an intermediate box that forwards to this one.  Sorry for the
false alarm.

> While SpamAssassin is installed on TriLUG's mail server, it's only
> enabled for users who run it from their ~/.procmailrc.  It doesn't
> interact with mailman at all.  

So SA on trilug.org only works for delivery of local trilug.org account
e-mail, assuming the user has enabled it via ~/.procmailrc.  Got it.

> The real solution is to change this list so that only members can post
> -- Jim Thompson, do you want to take care of this or should I?

Yep.  This is the solution I recently went to with a majordomo-based
mailing list I run on another server.  I get more bounces from people
who post from addresses that aren't subscribed.  I think I've heard that
mailman makes the process of allowing config of extra addresses for
posting relatively painless, but I could be wrong.

Mike

-- 
Mike Broome
mbroome(at)employees.org