[TriLUG] Off Topic: Enterprise... +0.75

[Christopher Knowles]

Wow, gotta disagree

ship +1

Aliens +1 from a male point of view... (Actually in the the other assessment 
I wrote I refferred to this as soft porn.  The "Decon" scene with T'Pol and 
Tucker was a bit over the top for Star Trek)

Plot Line: You could read through it.

Writing:  -10000.  They actually used "We're going in" more than once.  
GRRRR.  it's writing like that that makes people think of Science fiction 
fans as nerds.

Cast: For some reason the ensign pilot fellow really cheeses me off.  and 
that accent that Tucker has.  but I guess at least it isn't Deanna and 
Wesley.  

This premiere was poor.  But I think it was good enough to merit watching.  
It has the potential to have a better story arc than even DSN, which was 
(IMHO) the best plot of the ST shows.

So I guess I mostly agree, I'm still angry over what Berman did at the ending 
of ST:V.  Poof!  We're home!

(And the idea of Vulcan's as obstinate nearly evil people... the idea of 
disciplining a Vulcan... that kept making me feel all weird.)

CJK
On Wednesday 26 September 2001 11:00 pm, you wrote:
> Scott Bakula ... +1 good replacement for Kirk, he really pulls off those
> cheesy lines
>
> New (old) ship ... +1 good design, stayed with the dual pods.
>
> Sexy aliens ... +1  Oh, yeah!
>
> Plot line ... thin, but then aren't they all?
>
> Writing ... +1 better than any of the other series.
>
> Ensemble cast ... not as good as Next Gen, but pretty good.
>
> Continuity with other series ... +1 they stayed with the major points of
> the other series and didn't worry about any of the contradictions in them.
>
> Overall, I was very surprised by the premire.  All of the series seem to
> start poorly and then grow.  This one started out very good (well a little
> rough, but I thought ScottB really pulled it off).  Hopefully it will only
> get better.
>
> Jon
> _______________________________________________
> TriLUG mailing list
> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug