[TriLUG] different versions of 7.2 for sale]
Brent Fox
bfox at linuxheadquarters.com
Mon Oct 29 20:32:49 EST 2001
Hi Roy,
I work for Red Hat on the installer (and various config tools), and I'm
curious as to what people like better about the Mandrake installer. At the
end of every release, I do a comparative analysis on the installers for many
other OSes (various Linux distros, Solaris x86, various Windows versions,
etc.) to try to determine areas in which we are lacking. I do this because I
want our installer (and our OS as a whole) to be the best one available.
Specifically, how is Mandrake's installer easier to use? How does it help
you better understand what you are installing?
So I guess the question isn't just to Roy, but to everybody:
What can we do to make the Red Hat Linux installer better?
Cheers,
Brent
On Wednesday 24 October 2001 10:42 am, Vestal, Roy L. wrote:
> Being one from the Windoze world, I can say that I like the "bloating" in
> the install. I'm learning this from experience as well as books. I don't
> have the *nix background like alot of the folks in TriLUG. Being used to
> bloat from the master himself, Mr. G., it does help some.
>
> I do have one request, if any of the RH folks are reading, the installer
> from Mandrake is a lot easier to use for those of us that are learning this
> way. There is a lot of front end, and the install takes longer, but it
> helped me understand what I was installing. I personally WANT to use RH
> Linux, since I'm a homegrown NC boy, I prefer RH to any other. Call me a
> hick, or a good ol' boy, but I plan on hanging on.
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list