[TriLUG] rpm database question
Tom Bryan
tbryan at python.net
Tue Nov 20 12:56:25 EST 2001
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 05:44 am, you wrote:
> Adrian announced:
> > No, I build an rpm with the fix and install it.
>
> <sarcasm>Ahhh so you are a masochist then, eh?</sarcasm>
>
> RPM has some great potential. With some up to date book(s) on the subject,
> and maybe a packaging tool that works, I'd probably use it more. Building
> a package right now seems to be a major pain. I haven't found a reliable &
> easy way yet to build those pesky spec files. What's your secret?
You can use vendor-supplied RPMs, which may just work even with updated
source, or you can write your own. The problem with not basing your RPMs on
vendor-supplied RPMs is that you may be unable to install RPMs that rely on
the vendor's packages. For example, if a vendor-supplied RPM expects
python-devel, I don't think RPM would let you install it if you included the
vendor's python-devel files in a package that you call python.
If that isn't a concern, and if all you're doing is
./configure [options]
make
make install
then the .spec file isn't that hard. Here's a trimmed down .spec file for a
basic postgresql install.
Summary: PostgreSQL, packaged for running and/or developing EcoAccess software
Name: postgresql
Version: 7.1.3
Release: 1
#BuildRoot: /var/tmp/
Source0: postgresql-%{version}.tar.gz
Copyright: BSD-style
Group: Application/Database
Vendor: Yourself
Packager: You again <email at goes.here>
Provides: PostgreSQL
%description
Anyhting you want here
%prep
# unpack the sources under /usr/src/redhat
%setup -q -T -b 0 -n postgresql-%{version}
%build
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/postgresql-%{version}
make
%install
make install
%files
%defattr(-,postgres,postgres)
/usr/local/postgresql-%{version}
Perhaps we'll here more about such issues at the upcoming RPM talk. I hope
that I can make it. :)
---Tom
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list