[TriLUG] What does action mean in /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit?
lfwelty
lfwelty at redback.com
Tue Feb 5 22:51:24 EST 2002
What physical partition is /usr/share mounted on?
/dev/hd??
Is it really labelled correctly?
run e2label without any arguments to see if its labeled correclty.
If its not, run e2label with the new label (man e2label):
ex. e2label /dev/hda12 /usr/share
tune2fs may also be of help if this is the problem.
Hunh. I see below that it is being mounted. I don't know if it
would be mounted if the label were wrong... *must think*
Tom Bryan wrote:
>
> You may remember that I recently created a new partition for holding
> /usr/share since my /usr partition was almost full. I've migrated all of the
> data to my new partition, and /etc/fstab now looks like
>
> LABEL=/ / ext3 defaults 1 1
> LABEL=/usr/share /usr/share ext3 defaults 1 2
> LABEL=/data /data ext3 defaults 1 2
> /dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy auto noauto,owner 0 0
> LABEL=/opt /opt ext3 defaults 1 2
> LABEL=/usr /usr ext3 defaults 1 2
> LABEL=/usr/local /usr/local ext2 defaults 1 2
> LABEL=/oracle /oracle ext3 defaults 1 2
> LABEL=/mvstar /mvstar ext3 defaults 1 2
> inigo:/home /home nfs rw,bg,hard,intr 0 0
> inigo:/usr/local/CvsRoot /usr/local/CvsRoot nfs rw,bg,hard,intr 0 0
> none /proc proc defaults 0 0
> none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
> none /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0
> /dev/hda11 swap swap defaults 0 0
> /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom iso9660 noauto,owner,kudzu,ro 0 0
>
> The problem is that I keep getting
> Feb 5 22:14:55 localhost mount: mount: mount point /usr/share does not exist
> Feb 5 22:14:56 localhost rc.sysinit: Mounting local filesystems: failed
> on boot.
>
> The following line in /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit seems to be the one that's failing
> action $"Mounting local filesystems: " mount -a -t nonfs,smbfs,ncpfs -O
> no_netdev
>
> I don't know what "action" is. Once the system finishes booting, I see that
> the /usr/share partition has been mounted
> # mount
> ....
> /dev/hdb5 on /usr/share type ext3 (rw)
>
> Running the mount command from rc.sysinit on the command line produced no
> errors.
>
> Any ideas? Could the "action" command be detecting a bogus failure?
>
> Thanks,
> ---Tom
> _______________________________________________
> TriLUG mailing list
> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Frank Welty | 15401 Weston Parkway, Suite 150
lfwelty at redback.com | Cary, NC 27511
Redback Networks | desk:919-678-2175
------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list