[TriLUG] Proxim RangeLAN-DS 802.11b
Greg Brown
gregbrown at mindspring.com
Thu Feb 28 10:37:41 EST 2002
I like the Orinoco cards from Lucent (now Agere). I've had so much fun with
my PCMCIA cards and AP-500 access point that I can't imagine a time when I
didn't have these gizmos. Surfing in the Lazy Boy by the fireplace rocks.
Even though you'll see 802.11b stuff rated at 11 meg one thing to keep in
mind is that a LOT of that bandwidth is RF overhead so you're really going to
push about 4-5 meg tops. That's no big deal really, but when I want to
transfer anything over a gig (to servers in the house) I plug the laptop into
the 10/100 switch and let it rip rather than wait for half-duplex 11 minus
the RF overhead.
Greg
On Thursday 28 February 2002 10:17 am, you wrote:
> Geoff Purdy [geoff.purdy at verizon.net] wrote:
> > I suppose what I'm trying to understand is what makes one 802.11b card
> > better than another:
> > - linux support?
> > - speed?
> > - range?
> > - compatibility? (although I'm assuming that one 802.11b card cannot be
> > more 802.11b compatible than another)
> > - all of the above?
> > - other considerations?
>
> All of the above. Radio quality varies, which contributes to speed and
> range (as noise increases, speed and range drop - all 802.11b cards kick
> over from 11mb/s to 2mb/s at certain levels of signal).
>
> As for the compatibility, some vendors introduce little tweaks that are
> 'enhancements' to the spec that can only be used with their cards. Cisco
> has some additional encryption crap they can do (better than WEP).
>
> In the end, the most important is the Linux support. For some vendors
> there is only binary only drivers, for some none at all.
>
> Mike
----------------------------------------
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; charset="us-ascii";
name="Attachment: 1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description:
----------------------------------------
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list