[TriLUG] SRPMs on RHL 8.0
Tanner Lovelace
lovelace at wayfarer.org
Thu Oct 24 09:36:04 EDT 2002
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 14:33, Jeremy Portzer wrote:
> I'll of course let Jeremy K. provide his own answer, but my thought is
> that it allows the rpm package to not depend on a compiler and the rest
> of the build tools. This way, you can have a smaller installation that
> doesn't involve all the development tools, without breaking any
> dependencies. If rpm included the --rebuild option, and therefore
> depended on rpm-build, this wouldn't be possible.
Not necessarily true. You could have the main rpm executable
fail with an error whenever rpmbuild wasn't installed. In fact,
I believe I've seen this happen when the rpm-build rpm wasn't
installed on some versions of Redhat.
The point about not depending on the compiler is interesting,
though. I wouldn't think, though, that rpmbuild would depend
on a particular compiler, since I view it more like make -- a
generic facility that can execute whatever is needed to build
a package, be it gcc, perl, python, whatever. There shouldn't
be any "dependency" in the rpm sense there.
It does make sense, however, to not include that functionality
when not needed (i.e. small or embedded systems).
Cheers,
Tanner
--
Tanner Lovelace | lovelace at wayfarer.org | http://wtl.wayfarer.org/
--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--
GPG Fingerprint = A66C 8660 924F 5F8C 71DA BDD0 CE09 4F8E DE76 39D4
GPG Key can be found at http://wtl.wayfarer.org/lovelace.gpg.asc
--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--
Si hoc legere scis, nimium eruditionis habes.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.trilug.org/pipermail/trilug/attachments/20021024/fee32b2a/attachment.pgp>
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list