[TriLUG] Spamassassin question - Bayesian filtering

[Jeremy Portzer]

On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 14:00, Jon Carnes wrote:
> The training looks like a pain in the a**, but I think you could make it
> easier on the folks by setting up some scripts to accept forwarded
> messages from your local users.
> 
> Local users would forward mistakenly tagged messages to one of two
> addresses:
>   sa_nospam - indicating that this shouldn't have been marked as spam
>   sa_spam - indicating that this spam message slipped through
> 
> It would be up to you Jeremy to have your script reshape the message to
> its original form and then submit it back via the sa-learn command.
> 
> Just an idea, but it may work (and be a good contrib back into the
> community).

Here's another idea along the same lines for those using Exchange
servers (yeah, yeah)

http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=4120272

--Jeremy

-- 
/=====================================================================\
| Jeremy Portzer       jeremyp at pobox.com       trilug.org/~jeremy     |
| GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F  E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 |
\=====================================================================/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.trilug.org/pipermail/trilug/attachments/20030313/11432a14/attachment.pgp>