[TriLUG] Iptables confusion

lfwelty at nc.rr.com lfwelty at nc.rr.com
Fri May 2 16:46:53 EDT 2003


Jeremy Portzer wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-05-02 at 14:18, lfwelty at nc.rr.com wrote:
> 
> 
>>If you know which ports you need open, you can be even more specific than
>>the rule above and only explicitly allow known ports/services. It's almost
>>always better to grant access to known allowed services denying everything
>>else; than to deny known bad svcs allowing everything else.
> 
> 
> But he's using NFS, and there's no way to predict what ports NFS will
> use.  That's why the permissive rule is necessary.

Yup, you're right.

/paranoid-anal
He could only explicitly allow the subnet, though.
Or only allow the individual IPs required.
paranoid-anal/

> 
> --Jeremy
> 

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
  lfwelty at nc.rr.com: Earth is a beta site, I just wish that damn
                     pink elephant would give me my mouse back.
-----------------------------------------------------------------





More information about the TriLUG mailing list