[TriLUG] help with procmail/postfix
Jeremy Portzer
jeremyp at pobox.com
Tue Jul 29 19:11:44 EDT 2003
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, john broome wrote:
> Tom Woods wrote:
>
> >I'm wondering if it's normal to need the full path like this, or maybe I
> >have something misconfigured?
> >
> Actually when I was playing with filtering on the [SPAM] that SA adds to
> the subject I didn't put the full path for the folder and they were
> disappearing. I'll try it with the full path and see what that does.
Instead of filtering on the subject tag, you should filter on the
X-Spam-Status: header. Here are two examples:
For a 'standard' procmail setup with mbox folders:
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
spam
For the TriLUG setup:
:0
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
| $DELIVERTO +spam
Hope this helps,
Jeremy
--
/======================================================================\
| Jeremy Portzer jeremyp at pobox.com trilug.org/~jeremy |
| GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 |
\======================================================================/
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list