[TriLUG] help with procmail/postfix

Jeremy Portzer jeremyp at pobox.com
Tue Jul 29 19:11:44 EDT 2003


On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, john broome wrote:

> Tom Woods wrote:
> 
> >I'm wondering if it's normal to need the full path like this, or maybe I
> >have something misconfigured?
> >
> Actually when I was playing with filtering on the [SPAM] that SA adds to 
> the subject I didn't put the full path for the folder and they were 
> disappearing.  I'll try it with the full path and see what that does.

Instead of filtering on the subject tag, you should filter on the 
X-Spam-Status: header.  Here are two examples:

For a 'standard' procmail setup with mbox folders:

:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
spam

For the TriLUG setup:

:0
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
| $DELIVERTO +spam

Hope this helps,
Jeremy

-- 
/======================================================================\
|  Jeremy Portzer	jeremyp at pobox.com	trilug.org/~jeremy     |
|  GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F  E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 |
\======================================================================/




More information about the TriLUG mailing list