[TriLUG] Running swap as an LVM drive
Jon Carnes
jonc at nc.rr.com
Fri Aug 29 11:35:16 EDT 2003
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 00:04, Joseph Tate wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> You'll take a bit of a performance hit, as the LVM module does require
> some CPU time. Other than that, no.
>
> Jon Carnes wrote:
>
> |I was just playing with an install of RH9 and I made the machine have
> |one real partition (/boot => 100Mb) and the rest of the drives were all
> |used for LVM blocks. So naturally I setup swap within the LVM.
> |
> |Anyone know of any disadvantages in doing this?
> |
> |Jon Carnes
> |
Hmm, I've not heard or seen anything about LVM partitions taking more
resources (or time) to access. When I've used it on Solaris systems,
its actually sped up services that were disk I/O intensive (I assumed
because the requests were spread across multiple disks).
Just to be safe though, I reformatted the system this morning and moved
the Swap to it's own partitions (on three different drives).
Jon
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list