FW: [TriLUG] TriLUG Lunch
William Sutton
william at trilug.org
Sun Feb 8 02:17:51 EST 2004
I'm sorry to see the s/n ratio going down and sorry this is going to
contribute to it but
- Tanner, you don't have to tell Jim (or anyone else) that you're planning
to send him to /dev/null. The only purpose it serves is to cause further
grief.
- Even if you want to ignore him (and that's certainly your prerogative) I
didn't see you say anything about it when Jim first related the story in
#trilug AND this is the only email I've seen from him that contained
objectionable material. Therefore, there is hardly a pattern of emails as
you allege.
Yeah, we coulda done without the incident being mentioned. The best thing
to do is behave in a responsible adult manner by deleting the email and
moving on. Failing that, a polite private request for future forbearance
would be the next best thing.
shal (William) who hates playing Mr. Manners.
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Tanner Lovelace wrote:
> Jim Ray wrote:
> > certainly, a nice chuckle was the intended purpose. folks that get their
> > panties in a wad always have the option of hitting the delete key.
>
> Or, you could use this procmailrc recipe:
>
> * ^From.*jim at neuse.net
> /dev/null
>
> I am this close || to doing this myself. I am sick and
> tired of the infantile stuff from you Jim. Nobody cares.
> Get a life and learn some e-mail ettiquette (i.e. only
> rude forward personal e-mail to mailing lists).
>
> Tanner Lovelace
>
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list