[TriLUG] OT: list fork - moderated and unmoderated

[David R.Matusiak]

Yes, boys!!  This is genius!  Now we are getting to the true essence...

The true essence of hatred, that is.  Now you are beginning to 
understand how the Palestinians and Israelis feel about each other.  
Beautiful!

Just when I was getting terribly bored with my inbox, along comes this 
bile, vitriol and invective.  <sings>"These are a few of my favorite 
things!!"</>

Please keep it up.  And please let me know the where/when for the steel 
cage match.  I would love to see a bunch of computer nerds knocking the 
sh*t out of each other.  I will even buy beer afterwards.

Love,
dave m.

On Feb 9, 2004, at 10:23 PM, Jim Ray wrote:

> If folks are gonna get their panties in such a wad over a joke here and
> there despite the majority of my own posts being a sincere effort to 
> help
> others, me thinks it is time to let those folks form their own 
> moderated
> list.
>
> I don't need some self righteous pompous ace internet neophyte 
> delivering
> personal instructions to my inbox on netiquette.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tanner Lovelace [mailto:lovelace at wayfarer.org]
>> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 6:01 PM
>> To: jim at neuse.net
>> Subject: Re: [TriLUG] RFC: Mailing list protocol FAQ entry
>>
>> Jim Ray wrote:
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Tanner Lovelace [mailto:lovelace at wayfarer.org]
>>>> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 4:26 PM
>>>> To: jim at neuse.net
>>>> Subject: Re: [TriLUG] RFC: Mailing list protocol FAQ entry
>>>
>>>
>>> [Jim Ray sez:] you are not my mama.  Please blow it out your ace.  I
>> have
>>> tried to be nice.  Per federal spam laws, please do not send me 
>>> anymore
>>> email.
>>
>> Hahahaha!  You really don't know your laws do you?  The only federal
>> spam law there is is the CAN-SPAM act that was just passed.  And, 
>> there
>> are *no* local spam laws since it preempted it.  All the CAN-SPAM act
>> says is that the sender must not obscure their message.  Oh, and it 
>> only
>> refers to commercial e-mail, which this obviously is not.
>>
>>> Further disrespect *will* result in a complaint to the steering
>> committee
>>> due to your behavior.
>>
>> I'm sorry, Jim, but respect has to be earned and you so far have shown
>> no willingness to earn any respect at all.  Feel free to complain to 
>> the
>> SC all you want about my private e-mail to you but there's absolutely
>> nothing they can do about that.
>>
>> Tanner

--
"Take my word I'm a madman don't you know."  - Bernie Taupin, 1970
--