[TriLUG] LaTeX gurus: is it possible to ignore lines on 'include'

[Andrew Perrin]

I use BibTeX to track references, and it works nicely for me. I just keep
a central database (diss.bib, because it started as the database for my
dissertation) and use it for everything I write.

ap

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew J Perrin - http://www.unc.edu/~aperrin
Assistant Professor of Sociology, U of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
clists at perrin.socsci.unc.edu * andrew_perrin (at) unc.edu


On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Douglas Kojetin wrote:

> andrew (or anyone else)-
>
> just curious -- what software do you use to keep track of journal
> articles?  i'd like to get away from Endnote (grumble).
>
> thanks,
> doug
>
>
> On Mar 24, 2004, at 8:07 PM, Andrew Perrin wrote:
>
> > If you're willing to share, I'd appreciate seeing the solution to
> > this. I
> > don't know make, so don't use makefiles, so my usual solution is to
> > create
> > a preamble.tex file, then the main document is:
> >
> > \input{preamble}
> > \include{...}
> > \end{document}
> >
> > but that still requires some fiddling to LaTeX just particular
> > chapters; I
> > end up either having lines in those chapters that are commented out
> > when
> > running the whole book, or alternatively using shell files (i.e., files
> > with only one \include{} in them), or sometimes using \includeonly.
> > None
> > of these is optimal!
> >
> > ap
>
> --
> TriLUG mailing list        : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> TriLUG Organizational FAQ  : http://trilug.org/faq/
> TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
> TriLUG PGP Keyring         : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
>