[TriLUG] OT: Dial-Up ISP
W W M
scottishwalrus at yahoo.com
Sat May 8 15:14:00 EDT 2004
Jason Tower <jason at cerient.net> wrote:
> Ack. Looks like you got one of my hot buttons on this one. I guess
> I'm saying that you have to be very careful in how you define 'Linux
> friendly'. My personal take on it is that anyone who doesn't hang up
> on you the minute you say that you're using Linux is 'Linux
> friendly', even if they can't help you troubleshoot your
> configuration or tell you exactly what's wrong. But that's just my
> take.
IMHO "linux friendly" can best be defined as "doesn't require
proprietary crap to use it". in this case, a "linux friendly" dial-up
ISP simply needs to make one thing possible - a standard PPP connection
can be made with three pieces of info: a phone number, a username, and
a password. anything that "requires" some special win32 app just to
establish a connection is by definition not linux friendly.
case in point: one of my clients last year switched to bellsouth
biz-class DSL, which uses PPPoE. since they are using a linux box as a
nat gatway/firewall, i needed the proper auth info to set this up on
the outside interface. the bellsouth techie absolutely insisted that
you needed to run a win32 app to establish the PPPoE connection. after
***three hours*** i managed to get someone on the phone who gave me the
info i needed to set it up. i wasn't aksing them to do it for me, i
just wanted the fscking auth info so i could do it myself. had they
provided this upon request, i would call their service "linux
friendly". instead, their ironclad insistence that i run windows, even
when it wasn't actually necessary, won them my "don't ever do business
with these jackholes ever again" award.
Hear, hear!! :-)
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list