[TriLUG] sendmail vs. postfix - was Re: stupid sendmail question?

[Jeremy Portzer]

On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 13:57, David Rasch wrote:

> People keep commenting about the processing steps in sendmail,  yet
> qmail which I've found to be faster then sendmail in tests and
> implementations.  Qmail has an architecture similar to that of postfix.
> Though, I haven't tested with spam filtering, anti-virus, and other filters in
> the middle.  
> 

Qmail is a neat idea, but since it's not Free/Open Source Software, it's
never been a consideration for me.  I'd consider non-Free Speech
software if it's the only alternative, but since sendmail and postfix
are both F/OSS, it's easy to pick one of them.

--Jeremy, weaning himself from pine...

-- 
/---------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Jeremy Portzer        jeremyp at pobox.com      trilug.org/~jeremy     |
| GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F  E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 |
\---------------------------------------------------------------------/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.trilug.org/pipermail/trilug/attachments/20040617/d5ec27e2/attachment.pgp>