[TriLUG] RHAS---300gig?

[Jeremy Portzer]

On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 07:13, Brian Henning wrote:
> > Most companies see 300000mb as 300GB, but OSs see 300000 as 300000/1024 or
> 293GB..
> 
> Actually (for the sake of hair-splitting...), it's worse than that.
> Marketers see 300,000,000,000 bytes as 300 GB, while OSes will see it as
> 300,000,000,000 / (1024 * 1024 * 1024) = 279.4 GB.
> 
> I remember reading somewhere that it's the difference between "300GB" and
> "300 GB" but I'm not sure if that's true, and if it is I can't remember
> which is which.

The unambiguous way to resolve this is to use different prefixes when
referring to the 1024 multiples.  For examples, 300 GB = 279.4 GiB.
1 KiB = 1024 bytes, 1 MiB = 1024 KiB, 1GiB = 1024 MiB.

The Ki,Mi,Gi, prefixes are not officially part of the metric or US units
system but are beginning to see wider acceptance.  The original document
on this subject is here:  http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html
.  If you do a Google search on "Kibi Mebi Gibi" or something like that
you'll see many more informative articles.

I have to conclude that the drive manufacturers are "correct" when they
use the metric prefixes exactly as defined, K=10^3, M=10^6, G=10^9. 

--Jeremy

-- 
/---------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Jeremy Portzer        jeremyp at pobox.com      trilug.org/~jeremy     |
| GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F  E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 |
\---------------------------------------------------------------------/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.trilug.org/pipermail/trilug/attachments/20040722/4cb64dc4/attachment.pgp>