[TriLUG] Slightly OT: Which *BSD? OpenBSD!

[Brandon L. Newport]

The main thing we noticed was the network performance...it did not seem
to really slow under high loads.  However overall it just tested
better...disk IO/mem/CPU/etc  We tested with databases, web servers,
ftp, etc.  Over all it just did better.  That was a little over two
years ago.  We will probably test again next year.  One interesting
thing to note for anyone who has the on board promise IDE raid
cards...they work 200% better in FreeBSD than Linux....you can find a
dozen google search that talk about it.  It is kinda interesting.  Our
corporate web server uses IDE drives.  Other than we dont have enough
memory in it right now it does great!!! (shoe maker kids)

-brandon

On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 13:41, Shawn Page wrote:
> What kind of performance benefits specifically did you see with FreeBSD? 
> I haven't used it in a few years but really liked it.
> 
> Gentoo _is_ quite nice by the way and emerge almost seems easier than *BSD
> ports though I can't explain exactly why.
> 
> I'm currently trying out OpenBSD 3.5 at home and have found the install to
> be very quick and painless.  It is entirely text based though so be
> prepared.
> 
> -Shawn
> 
> 
> > The one cool feature of the xBSD is the ports collection.  Personally I
> > love the way it works.  It compiles the software the way you want,
> > instead of taking the defaults that someone else compiled for you.  The
> > closest distro to xBSD is Gentoo; however I have never used it.  I
> > typically use OpenBSD for firewalls, FreeBSD for servers and Linux for
> > desktops.  I have seen better performance on servers with sustained high
> > load on FreeBSD over Linux which is why I prefer it.  I have not played
> > with NetBSD in forever...I understand they are doing some sysV type
> > things with the boot process.  If you are wanting to learn, I would
> > suggest OpenBSD or FreeBSD.  Look at both and see which meets you needs
> > for software to install after the OS, you may be limited in OpenBSD
> > compared to FreeBSD.
> >
> > Good luck with your adventure...
> >
> > -brandon
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 10:42, Jon Carnes wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 10:17, Roy Vestal wrote:
> >> > I'm wanting to learn BSD. I've been reading up on the 3 I understand
> >> to be
> >> > the "Big 3": OpenBSD, NetBSD, and FreeBSD.
> >>
> >> If functionality is your primary criteria (unless you need some nice QoS
> >> based routing capabilities), then stay with Linux. Nothing is being
> >> developed faster - and it can do just about anything a computing system
> >> (or phone system) needs to do.
> >>
> >> But if security (and High Availability) is your primary criteria, then
> >> OpenBSD is the flavor you want to try. I run Mandrake and OpenBSD on my
> >> networks: Mandrake for it functionality (and I like MSEC), and OpenBSD
> >> for Firewalling and Failover (CARP is really cool).
> >>
> >> I've played with the three main variants and long ago chose OpenBSD as
> >> my favorite. It's track record is the best in the industry for security
> >> and for it's response to any security issues.
> >>
> >> It's also not as big a leap from Linux as you might think. Here is an
> >> article that will take about 2 hours to read (if you follow the primary
> >> links) that covers most of the differences between Linux and BSD:
> >> Migrating to OpenBSD
> >>   http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq9.html
> >>
> >> ... And here is a primer on PF (the firewall application in OpenBSD):
> >>   http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/index.html
> >>
> >> Have fun Roy!
> >>
> >> Jon Carnes
> >
> > --
> > TriLUG mailing list        : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> > TriLUG Organizational FAQ  : http://trilug.org/faq/
> > TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
> > TriLUG PGP Keyring         : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
> >
> >