[TriLUG] fedora 2 core or wait on fedora 3

[Gregory Woodbury]

On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 01:05:16PM -0400, Ralph Blach wrote:
> Gregory Woodbury wrote:
>   If you need stability, then go with FC2, but be aware
> >that there are several problems with it.
> 
> Greg, what are the problems with FC2?
> 
> 
>   I am will be using FC2 on x86 machine is as a  samba server,
> vtund server, nfs server, and mail server.
> 
> Chip

The problems are mostly with the nVidia cards and some USB and Firewire
devices.  For "vanilla" hardware and such, FC2 is fine.  The fedora-list
archives have lots of discussion about FC2.

	http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

-- 
G.Wolfe Woodbury     `- -'
RHCT                   U
The Line Eater is a boojum!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.trilug.org/pipermail/trilug/attachments/20040922/c0d90228/attachment.pgp>