[TriLUG] Whitebox vs. CentOS?

[john broome]

Matt Frye wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:28:11 -0400, Jeremy Portzer <jeremyp at pobox.com> wrote:
> 
>>On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 11:02, Matt Frye wrote:
>>
>>>>Any opinions from the group on differences between the two?
>>>
>>>Whitebox is stable and smooth.  CentOS does have a more active
>>>community, but the slower pace of WB fits my needs as a model closer
>>>to RHEL and less Fedora-like.
>>
>>I'm not sure what you mean by "slower pace."....
> 
> 
> Whatever.

Does that come with a "Talk to the hand, 'cause the face don't care" or 
the "I'm rubber, you're glue.." response?