[TriLUG] Whitebox vs. CentOS
Michael Thompson
thompson at easternrad.com
Tue Oct 19 15:06:46 EDT 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In case you haven't run into this issue yet, I'll save you a few seconds
reading the CentOS FAQ:
http://www.centos.org/index.php?option=faq&task=viewfaq&artid=24&Itemid=5
I'm sure you don't need me to tell you, we *all* read the FAQs first,
right???? (Yeah, right! I don't until I hit a roadblock...;)
HTH!
- --mike :D
Christopher L Merrill wrote:
| I wanted to follow-up on my previous questions.
|
| First, thanks for all the respones. After a little googling and
| reading from the two websites and various newsgroup postings, I opted
| to try out CentOS. This decision was primarily based on the size
| of the community around it, which seems to be somewhat larger than
| Whitebox. Incidentally, if we had more money to spend, I would have
| simply installed RHEL and been done with it.
|
| The initial installation went very smoothly - looking and acting
| just like the most recent RH I had installed (RH9). The first usage
| will be for our development server - serving for SCM, automated builds,
| unit testing and a Wiki. Sometime in the coming weeks, I'll be
| installing Tomcat, Subversion, Maven and a few other Java development
| tools.
|
| If I discover any suprises, I'll be sure to post them here.
|
| Thanks again,
| Chris
|
- --
Michael W. Thompson
Eastern Radiologists, Inc.
Information Technologies
Office: 252.754.5244
Direct: 252.931.7645
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFBdWXEuxlRkoWKZoMRAp5tAJ9ThNEG6PFeWsd9UVlDBn6uo+rjjQCfXo+V
o81HlbE32E5W6b7HWt9R80Q=
=VZy9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list