[TriLUG] Options for replacing Panasonic PBX with Asterisk
Aaron Joyner
aaron at joyner.ws
Mon Apr 10 20:00:39 EDT 2006
Jason Tower wrote:
> i have three polycom 501s for my business, all connected to a remote
> asterisk server using sip, they work without a hitch. very nice
> units, and nearly half the cost of a cisco 7960. only had them a few
> months so i can't speak about their durability, but they feel very solid.
>
> jason
>
>> The A-man knows his stuff. Those Cisco phones are built tough and really
>> last. We've seen some beaten and abused Cisco's come through here... but
>> they still work just fine.
>>
>> The Polycom's seem to be pretty good too - though they don't have the
>> long pedigree that the Cisco's have. The Polycom's give you a bit more
>> value (cheaper with more features). Currently those are the only two
>> brands I would recommend. The *good* cheaper brands tend to burn out
>> early. The bad ones just get flaky.
>>
>> Jon Carnes
>> FeatureTel (VoIP for business afraid to do Asterisk alone)
>>
Also, having done lots of side-by-side testing with the Polycom vs the
Cisco speaker phone, I can say that the Polycom is actually a notch or
two better. To put it in context, that's saying something, because when
I first heard that I wouldn't believe it, because the Cisco 79{4,6}0s
have exceptional speaker phones. The Polycom just has a nicer, fuller
sound with more bass, while still maintaining equally good mid-voice
range. In retrospect, since Polycom is primarily known for their
conference-room speaker phones, it shouldn't be too surprising.
Having said that, the Cisco phones are sleeker, and have a nicer GUI
interface, IMHO. And the speaker phone is really just fantastic unless
you've got it sitting right next to a Polycom. :)
Aaron S. Joyner
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list