[TriLUG] IRC lack-of-fun

Chris Knowles chrisk at trilug.org
Wed Aug 30 17:03:41 EDT 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hmm... no knickers twisted here.

I was mainly trying to point out that there is more than one way to skin
a cat.

Use of irssi and screen are actually a better fit for me than use of
something that would have no history of before I came in.  (in that I
don't want to keep xchat or an IM client running ALL the time)

I'm intrigued by how you can't run SSH and IRC for "political" reasons,
but a jabber client doing the exact same thing would be OK.

CJK

Dave Sorenson wrote:
> Good for you.. I'm glad that works for you. Politically it would not
> work for me for more reasons that I can get into on a public forum.  I
> don't "want something else" like a spoiled child, I'm sorry you got that
> impression. If Trilug chooses to not run a jabber server that's fine
> with me. The question was asked about alternatives and I responded. I'm
> sorry if got your knickers in a twist. Geeze
> 
> DS
> 
> 
> 
> Chris Knowles wrote:
>>
>> So, the use of the "We block IRC at work so I want something else"
>> argument isn't really effective.
>>
>> CJK
>>
>>   

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFE9f0sA6qv8hqmptoRAgJeAJ9nXe665zn/SCbva/GNPMArDAXhQQCfUWbx
LtTDjSCzjYb32QXQ5W71kLQ=
=XB4X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the TriLUG mailing list