[TriLUG] MAC-based web blocking
Brian Henning
brian at strutmasters.com
Tue Sep 12 08:38:04 EDT 2006
Heh. Yeah, except we don't currently do in-house DNS (though
eventually, if I ever have time for hobby projects like that, I would
love to set it up..)
~B
Shawn William Taylor wrote:
> Why don't you use an IP rule based on their DNS entry?
> They shouldn't be able to figure that out.
>
> Unless they monitor this list!
>
> :)
>
> shawn
>
>
>
>
>
> "Aaron S. Joyner" <aaron at joyner.ws>
> Sent by: trilug-bounces at trilug.org
> 09/11/2006 08:09 PM
> Please respond to
> Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list <trilug at trilug.org>
>
>
> To
> Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list <trilug at trilug.org>
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: [TriLUG] MAC-based web blocking
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Brian Henning wrote:
>
>> The reason I don't want to use IP-based rules is that our problem
>> users are probably resourceful enough to try resetting their IPs.
>>
>> But yeah, I was already on that track; glad to have some encouraging
>> suggestions. :-)
>>
>> Thanks!
>> ~B
>
> So I'm like 5 days late in replying to this... but do you think they're
> not also resourceful enough to change their MAC addresses? You could do
> it by switch port if you're feeling particularly script-happy (and have
> basic managed switches), but what keeps them from plugging into a new
> switch port? If you're feeling like doing it right, use a managed
> switch and 802.1x to lock them into a separate VLAN, from which
> controlling access is a simple matter of only allowing http through
> squid from the subnet associated with that VLAN. Anything else just
> helps you sleep better at night, thinking you've actually achieved some
> controls they can't get around. But perhaps sleep or plausible
> deniability is all you're really after.
>
> Aaron S. Joyner
--
----------------
Brian A. Henning
strutmasters.com
336.597.2397x238
----------------
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list