[TriLUG] file formats
Stephen Roller
scroller at ncsu.edu
Thu Sep 14 11:28:59 EDT 2006
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 11:20 -0400, Brian Henning wrote:
> I have to recommend against FAT for video files. Sure, FAT-32 claims to
> be able to address something like 2TB of storage, but I think you're
> taking chances by routinely storing upwards-of-two-GB files on any FAT
> partition. For the record, FAT-32's maximum single-file size is (2^32)
> - 1 bytes, or a byte less than 4GB (see
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314463/EN-US/ ).
I agree wholeheartedly. I made this mistake once, using a fat32 drive
for video editing. While recording from my mini-DV camera to the
computer, I went over the maximum file size several times. It took me
days to figure out why the video software was just giving up! You
*definitely* need to use a more modern filesystem, like NTFS or ext3.
For the record, NTFS support on linux is very good and stable right now.
Read is perfect, and Write is decent. Last I checked, the NTFS module
built in the kernel could write, but not make new files or new
directories.
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list