[TriLUG] Samba question

jonc at nc.rr.com jonc at nc.rr.com
Wed Dec 13 16:26:19 EST 2006


I've done a lot of this. Group shares generally work just fine. Heck as
long ago as 8 years ago I had this working for a large company with each
branch having their own shared folder areas. The folks didn't even know
that it was a Linux box running samba that they were attaching to.

Why don't you post your config. 

Jon

----- Original Message -----
From: Greg Brown <gwbrown1 at gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 9:33 am
Subject: [TriLUG] Samba question
To: Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list <trilug at trilug.org>

> Had anyone tried to set up a Samba share in the following manner:
> 
> /data1 (shared to all employees.  used as a general place where 
> everyone can
> dump files)
> /data1/marketing  (where only employees that are defined in the group
> marketing (in /etc/groups) can access the share?)
> 
> This seems it should be possible.  However this was tried in 
> practice users
> defined in the /etc/groups group for marketing will lose 
> connectivity to the
> /data1/marketing share occasionally.  Does anyone have a restrictive
> directory shared from within a general access shared directory working
> properly?
> 
> Would it be easier to just define the users instead of using groups 
> (likethe following example)?
> 
> [marketing]
>  comment = Marketing
>  path = /data1/marketing
>  valid users = mary fred
>  public = no
>  writable = yes
>  printable = no
>  create mask = 0765
> 
> 
> 
> Greg
> -- 
> TriLUG mailing list        : 
> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilugTriLUG Organizational 
> FAQ  : http://trilug.org/faq/
> TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
> 



More information about the TriLUG mailing list