[TriLUG] Samba question
jonc at nc.rr.com
jonc at nc.rr.com
Wed Dec 13 16:26:19 EST 2006
I've done a lot of this. Group shares generally work just fine. Heck as
long ago as 8 years ago I had this working for a large company with each
branch having their own shared folder areas. The folks didn't even know
that it was a Linux box running samba that they were attaching to.
Why don't you post your config.
Jon
----- Original Message -----
From: Greg Brown <gwbrown1 at gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 9:33 am
Subject: [TriLUG] Samba question
To: Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list <trilug at trilug.org>
> Had anyone tried to set up a Samba share in the following manner:
>
> /data1 (shared to all employees. used as a general place where
> everyone can
> dump files)
> /data1/marketing (where only employees that are defined in the group
> marketing (in /etc/groups) can access the share?)
>
> This seems it should be possible. However this was tried in
> practice users
> defined in the /etc/groups group for marketing will lose
> connectivity to the
> /data1/marketing share occasionally. Does anyone have a restrictive
> directory shared from within a general access shared directory working
> properly?
>
> Would it be easier to just define the users instead of using groups
> (likethe following example)?
>
> [marketing]
> comment = Marketing
> path = /data1/marketing
> valid users = mary fred
> public = no
> writable = yes
> printable = no
> create mask = 0765
>
>
>
> Greg
> --
> TriLUG mailing list :
> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilugTriLUG Organizational
> FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/
> TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
>
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list