[TriLUG] [OT] Content/Load Balancing switches

[OlsonE at aosa.army.mil]

Well, that blows my idea out of the water. We're using Cisco (SLB) +
Windows NLB (varies for services offered). I suppose the real decision
for what you're going to use should be based off the size of the
organization.

-----Original Message-----
From: trilug-bounces at trilug.org [mailto:trilug-bounces at trilug.org] On
Behalf Of Tarus Balog
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 6:33 AM
To: Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list
Subject: Re: [TriLUG] [OT] Content/Load Balancing switches


On Jan 8, 2007, at 6:05 PM, Chris Bullock wrote:

> We are possibly getting ready to start supporting a vendor that can 
> use load balancing.  What are the preferred vendors and models for 
> load balancers?  My preference is for HP but I have been told that HP 
> has discontinued their line of load balancing switches.  I would 
> prefer *not* to buy Cisco, just because I dislike their stratagy of 
> having to purchase upgrades and I also dislike their license model, 
> but please lets not go off on that tangent.

I'm at a client site that is using Radware and seems happy with it,
FWIW.

-T

_______________________________________________________________________
Tarus Balog, OpenNMS Maintainer             Main:   +1 919 533 0160
The OpenNMS Group, Inc.                     Fax:    +1 503 961 7746
Skype: tarusb                               Direct: +1 919 647 4749
Email: tarus at opennms.org                    URL: http://www.opennms.org
PGP Key Fingerprint: 8945 8521 9771 FEC9 5481  512B FECA 11D2 FD82 B45C


-- 
TriLUG mailing list        :
http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
TriLUG Organizational FAQ  : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member
Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/