[TriLUG] [OT] Content/Load Balancing switches
jonc
jonc at nc.rr.com
Tue Jan 9 10:00:26 EST 2007
I'm going to third this suggestion.
I ran a LVS cluster at a former company for several years - built on
cast off hardware (so the cost was just my $TIME). About a year after I
left, they dropped this down and put in place a "real" solution that
cost just a bit more then $20k. The site went from 0% downtime over a 4
years to periodic outages... (of course it only went down during peak
use :-)
LVS is surprisingly robust... and you have direct access to the
maintainer of the HOWTO!
<aside: shouldn't Joe give a talk about LVS?>
Jon Carnes
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 09:10, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 01:55:04 -0800 (PST)
> Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack at wm7d.net> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Chris Bullock wrote:
> >
> > > We are possibly getting ready to start supporting a vendor
> > > that can use load balancing. What are the preferred
> > > vendors and models for load balancers?
> >
> > How about LVS.
> >
> > (disclaimer - I maintain the LVS HOWTO)
> >
> > Joe
>
> I'd have to second Joe---I've been running a pair of LVS boxes in a
> hot-standby configuration for almost the last two years and have never
> had any problems at all, though my configuration isn't particularly
> exotic, either.
>
> They're cheap 2Ghz P4s with 512MB, but they're handling several
> megabits of traffic with load averages of 0, and I expect them to scale
> a much further. The hardware probably cost less than $2K.
>
> I am at best a talented amateur when it comes to network stuff, so it
> did take some time to wrap my head around how things needed to be set
> up to support LVS-DR, but once the lightbulb went on, the actual
> configuration of the software---I'm using ldirectord and heartbeat---was
> simple.
>
> Mike.
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list