[TriLUG] SAS vs. SATA performance
bak
bak at picklefactory.org
Thu Jul 26 12:10:50 EDT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I don't have any hard data on hand to give you, but I would expect
something on the order of 2x the operations per second (before latency
gets unbearable) from a SAS drive compared to SATA, even at the same
rotational speed. Will that matter for what you're doing? If your I/O
is very random, definitely. If it's very sequential, probably not so much.
- --bak
Lee wrote:
> Does anyone have any info on SAS vs. SATA performance (at the same
> RPM, 10k)?
> -Lee
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFGqMeJOazs9hveao0RAjIUAJ0d6BMuucK40JvO7KijJP9Lz0+btgCghrCg
H1SkcFToUOVP03eaKkTMlaE=
=fpSe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list