[TriLUG] SWAP size vs physical RAM size
Joseph Mack NA3T
jmack at wm7d.net
Tue Aug 7 13:55:45 EDT 2007
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Brian Henning wrote:
> Hi Gang,
>
> I built a server some time ago. When I built it, it had 2GB physical
> RAM, so I created a swap partition 4GB in size (somewhere along the way
> I picked up swap = 2x physical as a rule of thumb). I'm about to
> upgrade the RAM to at least 4GB; possibly 6 or 10 GB (depending on the
> capabilities of the motherboard). It's not a simple matter at this
> point to create a 8 - 20 GB swap partition (until other hardware
> upgrades are made), so my question is, how crucial is it to have a swap
> file a lot larger than the physical ram space?
not at all. You need RAM+SWAP to be greater than the memory
needs for any combination of jobs you'll ever run. You've
already shown that your mix of jobs can fit into 2+4=6G. If
you then go to 6G of RAM, without changing your job mix, you
won't need any swap at all.
Joe
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list