[TriLUG] Code of Conduct

[Greg Brown]

I think you are on a slippery slope with this one though you do have a good
point.  You can't regulate or dictate what someone outside the group is
going to think about the people inside the group.  Personally I don't think
people searching the archive would make a generalization about TriLUG as a
whole when and IF they would encounter an OT conversation.

Let's not censor the list down to what are only approved topics.  What is
the next step?  To have to "greenlight" all topics by committee before they
hit the list?

On 8/13/07, Tanner Lovelace <clubjuggler at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 8/13/07, Warren Myers <volcimaster at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Right, and so when said disagreements happen, delete the message, or
> take it
> > to the person individually. This isn't complicated.
>
> Why should we have to hit the delete button?  And how does it look to an
> outsider, when they're looking for information on linux, to go to our
> archives
> and see a lot of off-topic, childish messages about catcalls and guns and
> other
> stuff.  There is no delete button in our archives.  Is this really the way
> we
> want to present ourselves to outsiders?
>
> Tanner
> --
> Tanner Lovelace
> clubjuggler at gmail dot com
> http://wtl.wayfarer.org/
> (fieldless) In fess two roundels in pale, a billet fesswise and an
> increscent, all sable.
> --
> TriLUG mailing list        : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> TriLUG Organizational FAQ  : http://trilug.org/faq/
> TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
>