[TriLUG] TriLUGnet (was New to the area now, and DSL issues)
Christopher L Merrill
chris at webperformance.com
Thu Sep 25 22:27:01 EDT 2008
Just for fun, I did the same - my route from home to my office (13 miles away)
is a bit longer. This was surprising (to me) since RR is the provider at each
end. According to ip2location.com, my packets are going through Virginia, New
York and California.
That seems somewhat unlikely, but I know little about this - so what is the
odds that these are the real geographic locations?
traceroute to webperformance.dyndns.org (24.28.193.9), 30 hops max, 38 byte pack
ets
1 192.168.7.1 (192.168.7.1) 2.433 ms 2.518 ms 1.808 ms
2 10.119.192.1 (10.119.192.1) 10.293 ms 9.751 ms 21.710 ms
3 gig9-1-2.rlghncg-rtr1.nc.rr.com (66.26.33.15) 9.058 ms 7.975 ms 10.796 ms
4 pos1-1.rlghnca-rtr1.nc.rr.com (24.25.20.29) 13.685 ms 13.505 ms 10.528 ms
5 ge-2-3-0.rlghncpop-rtr1.southeast.rr.com (24.93.64.164) 12.371 ms 11.687 m
s 12.107 ms
6 ae-3-0.cr0.dca10.tbone.rr.com (66.109.6.80) 22.068 ms 19.271 ms 30.908 ms
7 66.109.6.125 (66.109.6.125) 20.241 ms 21.135 ms 31.557 ms
8 hrndvaspk-swt1-ge2-13.hrndva.rr.com (24.30.192.70) 19.277 ms 19.630 ms 19
.099 ms
9 * 24.28.193.9 (24.28.193.9) 20.434 ms *
10.119.192.1 - - - - PRIVATE IP ADDRESS LAN
66.26.33.15 US UNITED STATES NORTH CAROLINA FT. BRAGG ROAD RUNNER
24.25.20.29 US UNITED STATES NORTH CAROLINA OXFORD ROAD RUNNER
24.93.64.164 US UNITED STATES VIRGINIA GREAT FALLS ROAD RUNNER
66.109.6.80 US UNITED STATES NEW YORK NEW YORK ROAD RUNNER
66.109.6.125 US UNITED STATES NEW YORK NEW YORK ROAD RUNNER
24.30.192.70 US UNITED STATES CALIFORNIA GARDEN GROVE ROAD RUNNER
24.28.193.9 US UNITED STATES VIRGINIA BURKE ROAD RUNNER
Cristóbal Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Mark Turner <jmarkturner at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'd like to see a free, region-wide community network spring up, with an
>> interconnect at MCNC. Why should my packets go through Washington, DC on
>> their way to my next-door neighbor's house?
>
> Because AT&T have been crappy about peering agreements since 2007 [0].
>
>> I think the City of Raleigh would be open to such a network being set up
>> around town, as long as there was a viable organization to maintain it.
>
> Whose dark fiber would we be leasing? What area would we be covering?
> Would we be doing simple ADSL with no frills for like-minded techheads
> like ourselves or trying to be an honest-to-goodness coop ISP? I
> desperately want something like this to actually happen, because this
> is the traceroute from by apartment (ADSL courtesy AT&T) to my office
> (UNC campus, about 0.8 miles away):
>
> My traceroute [v0.72]
> hume (0.0.0.0)
> Thu Sep 25 22:04:31 2008
> Resolver: Received error response 2. (server failure)er of fields quit
>
> Packets Pings
> Host
> Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
> 1. 192.168.1.1
> 0.0% 13 2.4 2.2 1.4 4.3 0.9
> 2. ???
> 3. 68.216.218.69
> 0.0% 13 10.4 11.9 10.4 17.6 1.9
> 4. 68.216.218.85
> 0.0% 13 10.7 19.8 10.7 50.4 12.9
> 5. 205.152.181.13
> 0.0% 13 52.2 31.6 23.2 71.4 14.2
> 6. ixc01int-pos-6-0-0.bellsouth.net
> 0.0% 13 25.2 46.3 23.7 222.0 53.8
> 7. 205.152.26.66
> 0.0% 13 92.9 31.5 23.9 92.9 18.7
> 8. axr01clt-so-2-0-0.bellsouth.net
> 0.0% 13 23.6 26.2 23.6 33.4 3.1
> 9. 205.152.174.18
> 0.0% 13 24.5 24.6 23.3 25.8 0.8
> 10. ixc01gsp-pos-6-0-0.bellsouth.net
> 0.0% 13 23.2 24.7 23.1 33.7 2.8
> 11. ixc00gsp-ge-0-0-0.bellsouth.net
> 0.0% 13 78.6 34.8 23.3 78.6 18.1
> 12. axr00asm-so-2-3-0.bellsouth.net
> 0.0% 13 44.3 27.7 23.7 44.3 5.4
> 13. 65.83.238.76
> 0.0% 13 25.9 24.9 23.5 30.8 1.9
> 14. 65.83.238.174
> 0.0% 13 85.2 36.9 23.9 85.2 20.7
> 15. tbr1.attga.ip.att.net
> 0.0% 13 72.2 33.8 24.9 72.2 13.7
> 16. ggr3.attga.ip.att.net
> 0.0% 13 37.2 28.4 23.8 44.1 6.5
> 17. 192.205.34.62
> 0.0% 13 24.8 26.6 23.9 33.0 2.8
> 18. ae-63-51.ebr3.Atlanta2.Level3.net
> 0.0% 13 39.1 31.9 24.6 40.8 6.1
> 19. ae-2.ebr1.Washington1.Level3.net
> 0.0% 13 42.1 46.1 41.5 73.2 8.6
> 20. ae-81-81.csw3.Washington1.Level3.net
> 0.0% 13 82.4 52.9 42.3 82.4 10.3
> 21. ae-82-82.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net
> 0.0% 13 41.2 50.5 41.2 73.4 9.1
> 22. ae-6-6.car2.Raleigh1.Level3.net
> 7.7% 13 51.7 49.5 46.8 60.1 3.6
> 23. ae-11-11.car1.Raleigh1.Level3.net
> 0.0% 13 48.1 49.4 46.3 58.5 3.3
> 24. MCNC.car1.Raleigh1.Level3.net
> 0.0% 13 48.0 49.5 47.2 55.5 2.6
> 25. rtp7600-gw-to-rtp1-gw-sec.ncren.net
> 0.0% 13 47.6 55.4 47.6 120.1 20.0
> 26. unc7600-gw-to-rtp7600-gw.ncren.net
> 25.0% 13 48.4 55.5 48.4 89.7 13.2
> 27. 128.109.36.253
> 0.0% 12 97.1 69.1 50.3 123.0 23.5
> 28. el-loco-v5.net.unc.edu
> 0.0% 12 63.8 61.1 48.6 123.5 20.4
> 29. goatrance.metalab.unc.edu
> 0.0% 12 49.0 58.4 49.0 94.6 16.0
>
>
> Just in cased you missed that, packets go from my apartment to
> Atlanta, then Washington DC, then Raleigh, then MCNC (RTP), then back
> to UNC and finally my office. Ridiculous.
>
> Cheers,
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------ -
Chris Merrill | Web Performance, Inc.
chris at webperformance.com | http://webperformance.com
919-433-1762 | 919-845-7601
Website Load Testing and Stress Testing Software & Services
------------------------------------------------------------------------ -
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list