[TriLUG] Time Warner Responds to bandwidth concerns

[Neil L. Little]

I believe that TW successfully argued the point a couple of years ago 
that they were no longer a monopoly and thus could no longer be restricted.
Still, it does stick sideways in the craw. Things are getting (?!) back 
to the old "We are the telephone company <snork! snork!>!" type of attitude.
I propose Revolution!

73,
Neil, WA4AZL

Michael Kimsal wrote:
> I'd recommend contacting some state authorities.  I'm contacting the
> Attorney General's office
> via http://www.ncdoj.com/consumerprotection/cp_contactus.jsp as a start.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:43 AM, <burnett at pobox.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Jason Herr wrote:
>>
>>  What are our options?  Isn't this sort of thing regulated?
>>     
>> From Stop the Cap
>> http://stopthecap.com/
>> this week:
>>
>> "Rep. Eric Massa (D-NY) Condemns Time Warner Internet Cap; Will Take Lead
>> Role in Opposition"
>> http://tinyurl.com/dbqp2s
>>
>>
>> regards,
>> Steve Burnett
>> http://www.trilug.org/~badger <http://www.trilug.org/%7Ebadger>
>>
>>
>>
>>  J
>>     
>>> Ivan Panarusky wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Yep. That copy of vmware, the ubuntu iso, and those half dozen high res
>>>> videos I downloaded won't put me anywhere near the cap.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Lance A. Brown <lance at bearcircle.net
>>>>         
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>           
>>>>         
>>>>> http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Midmarket/Time-Warner-to-Offer-150-Unlimited-Bandwidth-668524/
>>>>>
>>>>> I feel so much better now...
>>>>>
>>>>> --[Lance]
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>  GPG Fingerprint: 409B A409 A38D 92BF 15D9 6EEE 9A82 F2AC 69AC 07B9
>>>>>  CACert.org Assurer
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> --
>>>>         
>> TriLUG mailing list        : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
>> TriLUG FAQ  : http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>