[TriLUG] Time Warner Cable not through fighting

[OlsonE at aosa.army.mil]

I give this guy props ...he's not even in my district, and he still replied.

-----Original Message-----
From: trilug-bounces at trilug.org [mailto:trilug-bounces at trilug.org] On Behalf Of Michael Kimsal
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 2:51 PM
To: Triangle Linux Users Group General Discussion
Subject: Re: [TriLUG] Time Warner Cable not through fighting

Wow.  No one replied to me, not even my own reps for my area.  :(

On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2:28 PM, <OlsonE at aosa.army.mil> wrote:

> Looks like out of all the phone calls and e-mails to the people below, one
> gave me a response:
>
> "Thank you for your e-mail on the regulation of competition between local
> government and private businesses that provide communication services to the
> public (Senate Bill 1004). It must be a priority of the state to expand
> broadband access.
>
> I will take your thoughts into consideration as Senate Bill 1004 comes
> before me in the Senate.
>
> Again, I appreciate your e-mail, and please feel free to contact me again
> if you have other concerns on this or other legislation.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Josh Stein"
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: trilug-bounces at trilug.org [mailto:trilug-bounces at trilug.org] On
> Behalf Of Ron Young
> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 8:22 AM
> To: Triangle Linux Users Group General Discussion
> Subject: Re: [TriLUG] Time Warner Cable not through fighting
>
> All,
>
> Here is a concise list of the Senators on the Commerce committee:
>
> RC.Soles at ncleg.net, Floyd.McKissick at ncleg.net, David.Hoyle at ncleg.net,
> Tony.Rand at ncleg.net, Tom.Apodaca at ncleg.net, Tony.Foriest at ncleg.net,
> Larry.Shaw at ncleg.net, Phil.Berger at ncleg.net, Doug.Berger at ncleg.net,
> Harris.Blake at ncleg.net, Julia.Boseman at ncleg.net,
> Peter.Brunstetter at ncleg.net,
> Debbie.Clary at ncleg.net, Katie.Dorsett at ncleg.net, James.Forrester at ncleg.net
> ,
> Linda.Garrou at ncleg.net, Eddie.Goodall at ncleg.net, Steve.Goss at ncleg.net,
> Malcolm.Graham at ncleg.net, Neal.Hunt at ncleg.net, Jim.Jacumin at ncleg.net,
> Clark.Jenkins at ncleg.net, Martin.Nesbitt at ncleg.net,
> William.Purcell at ncleg.net,
> Bob.Rucho at ncleg.net, Josh.Stein at ncleg.net, Richard.Stevens at ncleg.net,
> Don.Vaughan at ncleg.net
>
>
> Ron Young
> 919-621-9015
>
> +++++++++++++++++++
> Little tiny dreams require little tiny thoughts and little tiny steps.
> Great big dreams require great big thoughts and little tiny steps.
> +++++++++++++++++++
>
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 8:04 AM, <OlsonE at aosa.army.mil> wrote:
>
> > I think it's about time I ditch TW.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: trilug-bounces at trilug.org [mailto:trilug-bounces at trilug.org] On
> > Behalf Of mgmonza
> > Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 12:34 AM
> > To: Triangle Linux Users Group General Discussion
> > Subject: Re: [TriLUG] Time Warner Cable not through fighting
> >
> > Mark Turner wrote:
> > > When it looked as if the House bill would be appropriately dispatched
> > > today, the folks at Time Warner Cable opted to try their luck with the
> > > Senate version.
> > >
> > > It goes to the Senate Commerce committee early tomorrow at 8 AM. Yes,
> > > that's right: 8 AM.
> > >
> > > If you're a night owl and have the time, please call the committee
> > > members at this list and let them know what you think of this bad
> > > bill. Just by leaving voicemail you can make a difference.
> > >
> > > You can find the list of members here:
> > >
> >
> http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/gascripts/Committees/Committees.asp?sAction=ViewCommittee&sActionDetails=Senate%20Standing_67
> > >
> > >
> > > My blog about today's House meeting:
> > >
> >
> http://www.markturner.net/2009/05/06/time-warner-cable-protection-act-not-dead-yet/
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mark Turner
> > > www.markturner.net
> > > --
> > > TriLUG mailing list        :
> > > http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> > > TriLUG FAQ  : http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions
> > >
> > Thanks for the heads-up, the pertinent info and the list of names and
> > numbers.  This is too easy - making excuses not to call is now more work
> > than to call, so I'm a-callin.
> >
> >
> > MG
> > --
> > TriLUG mailing list        :
> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> > TriLUG FAQ  : http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions
> > --
> > TriLUG mailing list        :
> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> > TriLUG FAQ  : http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions
> >
> --
> TriLUG mailing list        : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> TriLUG FAQ  : http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions
> --
> TriLUG mailing list        : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> TriLUG FAQ  : http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions
>



-- 
Michael Kimsal
http://jsmag.com - for javascript developers
http://groovymag.com - for groovy developers
919.827.4724
--
TriLUG mailing list        : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
TriLUG FAQ  : http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions