[TriLUG] posting to trilug vs linuxquestions.org

[Charles Fischer]

At 05:21 PM 11/22/2009, you wrote:
>Trilug is mainly for debate over vi vs. emacs.


No, TriLUG is mainly for debate over Bar-BQ.

Be warned.

To be serious, TriLUG is great for a lot of questions like:
Do you have W?
Can I look at X?
Can I borrow Y?
Do you know where I can get Z?

TriLUG is also a source for employs and employment.

I have also found TriLUG to be very good and quick at answering Linux 
questions on any subject from networking to video.

Glad to have you,
Charles Fischer



>-----Original Message-----
>From: trilug-bounces at trilug.org [mailto:trilug-bounces at trilug.org] On
>Behalf Of btncix btncix
>Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 4:50 PM
>To: trilug at trilug.org
>Subject: [TriLUG] posting to trilug vs linuxquestions.org
>
>I participate on the linuxquestions.org forums, but I see the benefits
>of
>the LUG meetings and having a physical community nearby.
>
>This email is not a criticism but more a question. For technical
>questions
>with respect to linux, I would think it's better to post to
>linuxquestions.org rather than the trilug mailing list to reach more of
>the
>masses. Now, if I wanted to start a project, it may be better to post to
>trilug - although not necessary, there are benefits to being able to
>meet in
>person. I was just curious if my assumptions are correct or if I am
>missing
>some points.
>
>Thanks,
>btncix
>--
>TriLUG mailing list        :
>http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
>TriLUG FAQ  : http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions
>--
>TriLUG mailing list        : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
>TriLUG FAQ  : http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions