[TriLUG] Google Wave and the sound of crickets
Justis Peters
jtrilug at indythinker.com
Tue Dec 8 11:05:22 EST 2009
As Weave writes below, "a flurry of activity and then crickets..." This
is the same thing I'm hearing from everyone: flurry of activity (if
you're lucky) and then crickets (everyone gets the crickets).
The primary problem is that nobody is in the habit of checking Google
Wave and it doesn't come with a default "notifier", "system tray icon",
or "toaster pop-up". There are a few third-party options out there,
though. If you can convince a handful of your friends to install one of
them, your little corner of Wave will at least be noisier than the
crickets now and then.
The one that will most likely help people using Linux is the Firefox plugin:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/14973
http://thatsmith.com/2009/10/google-wave-add-on-for-firefox
http://lifehacker.com/5381297/google-wave-notifier-alerts-you-to-unread-waves
There are some Windows ones that integrate directly into the system
tray. One of them even claims to work under wine. Getting this into the
systray, though, will get your Windows friends to start speaking up over
the crickets, too:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/wave-notify/
http://wavenotifier.dantup.me.uk/
http://www.softwarebakery.com/frozencow/googlewavenotifier.html
The next thing you need is to think about what this platform might
actually be useful for. Here's some of what it's ready for today:
+ The middle ground between email and IM: It does threaded conversation,
like forums, but you can also see each other type in real time. You can
work synchronously, asynchronously, or a little bit of both. You even
get a slider bar for the history, so that you can see how the
conversation developed while you were gone.
+ Collaborative document editing: It can handle more simultaneous users
than Google Docs. You can insert threaded conversation right into the
middle of the doc, discuss it until consensus emerges, replace the
conversation with text everyone agrees on, and even use the slider bar
to go back in history and see the discussion that preceded the
consensus. When your group is done collaborating on it, you can copy it
to a new wave, where the prior history is gone but the next group can
create their own edits and history.
+ Collaborative solution hunts: Have you ever searched the web for a
solution to a problem, found that there are 5000 search results, 30
unique solutions, and a mountain of sifting before you're convinced you
have the best solution? Try inviting 5 friends to help you in a wave.
Paste the candidate solutions into the wave by URL. Discuss the pros and
cons under each one. Narrow the field until you agree on which solutions
fit best.
+ Collaborative note taking: If multiple people share the same Wave
during a meeting or presentation, not everyone has to take notes on
every point. When the meeting is over, the participants should have a
well groomed document with most of the useful points they wanted to take
away from the event.
There are hundreds of things that Wave may be useful for in the future,
but the the ones above are a good start. Keep an eye on interesting
developments around new wave "robots" and "gadgets". When it will get
really exciting is when people start producing third party clients and
start federating their own Wave servers into the system. The underlying
protocols in this system are open standards and highly extensible. You
can build some really interesting blends on private and public systems
with this. If you're interested, dig into some of the white papers and
academic stuff on the topic. The "secret sauce" is a concept called the
"operational transformation". You might also be interested to know that
the "blips" that it sends to represent an operational transformation go
over XMPP.
How 'bout them crickets? Anybody want to start a wave about BBQ? Perhaps
a debate about emacs vs. vi?
Kind regards,
Justis
Brian Weaver wrote:
> Yeah, that's the same kind of effect that I saw. Me and a few friends had a flurry of activity and then crickets...
>
> On Dec 8, 2009, at 8:04 AM, <OlsonE at aosa.army.mil> <OlsonE at aosa.army.mil> wrote:
>
>> Not to sound noobish here, but to what extent is everyone using Google Wave for? I've got it, tons of friends on it... but once we got our invites and signed in it kinda died off...
>>
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list