[TriLUG] Need secondary DNS provider

[Alan Porter]

 > This road is already very well-traveled (1) and I'm sure
 > the current and future SC don't want *another* service to
 > learn and maintain with every SC roll-over.

Just to clarify, I said that I *personally* did not want to
investigate this.  I have plenty of other things to keep me
busy.

However, if someone comes up with a workable solution (and
both Magnus and Brian touched on some good starting points),
I have no problem with hosting this kind of thing on the LUG
servers.  After all, that what they are there for... to learn,
tinker, and share.

Like Cristobal said, before we host it, we would want to know
that the solution is robust, secure, and documented enough
for our ever-rotating staff of sysadmins and SC volunteers.

Alan





.