[TriLUG] [BGLUG] problems with multiple interfaces on a RHEL5.5 x64 machine
Seva A
oddissyus at gmail.com
Wed Nov 9 15:20:25 EST 2011
Just curious on a use case where you would need to configure both devices
in the same
subnet!
Default gateway is going to be bound to a single device, so all out going
data (including
those in the same subnet) will be routed though this gateway. Of course,
the respective
devices receive their in-bound data separately; is this the reason for this
configuration?
__
Seva
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Warren Myers <volcimaster at gmail.com> wrote:
> I finally found a fix!
>
> In the ifcfg script for eth1 I added the following:
>
>
> BROADCAST=172.17.11.255
>
>
> That took care of it. No - don't know why or what it's for, but it works
> now :)
>
> WMM
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 19:57, Brian Smith <pingwin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > what's your routing tables look like? `route -n`
> >
> > also if you can try to grab a traceroute to an external network it will
> > show you where the break in the route is. `traceroute -n`
> >
> > Also check to make sure you have a good link as well... `ethtool eth1`
> > `ethtool eth2`
> >
> > Might help point you in the right direction at least.
> >
> --
> This message was sent to: oddissyus at gmail.com <oddissyus at gmail.com>
> To unsubscribe, send a blank message to trilug-leave at trilug.org from that
> address.
> TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> Unsubscribe or edit options on the web :
> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/options/trilug/oddissyus%40gmail.com
> TriLUG FAQ :
> http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions
>
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list