[TriLUG] recommendations for hosted telephone service

[Jim Ray]

I use nexVortex and am well pleased. Unlimited number of calls. No long-term contract. Priced on minutes used. Fail over to cell phone. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 24, 2012, at 10:01 AM, "Reginald.Reed at emc.com" <Reginald.Reed at emc.com> wrote:

> On a similar subject, does anyone have a recommendation for a semi-reliable SIP trunk provider for low volume usage?  I'd like something that can handle a couple of lines for a free DID I have for incoming and outgoing calls.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: trilug-bounces at trilug.org [mailto:trilug-bounces at trilug.org] On
>> Behalf Of William
>> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 12:45 PM
>> To: Triangle Linux Users Group General Discussion
>> Subject: Re: [TriLUG] recommendations for hosted telephone service
>> 
>> Jonathan,
>> 
>> Please check out M5 Network, or Bandwidth, we used M5 as hosted VOIP to
>> replace old on-premise norstar system, worked great, the sound quality
>> is better than old phone, reliability is depending on your internet
>> connection, their site is reliable as far as we can tell.
>> 
>> All configuration is online, easy to do.
>> 
>> William
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________
>> From: Jim Ray <jim at neuse.net>
>> To: Triangle Linux Users Group General Discussion <trilug at trilug.org>
>> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 4:45 PM
>> Subject: Re: [TriLUG] recommendations for hosted telephone service
>> 
>> We turned up 25 direct inward dial phone system for a customer and have
>> total monthly recurring $170 per month.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On Jul 20, 2012, at 4:43 PM, "Jonathan Woodbury" <jonathan at mybox.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello all,
>>> 
>>> My employer is looking to replace an old on-premise telephone system
>> with a
>>> hosted telephone service.  I know that FeatureTel (now Telovations)
>> is a
>>> TriLUG sponsor and we are indeed considering them, but are there any
>> other
>>> providers the TriLUG community might recommend?
>>> 
>>> We have about 70 users and I believe our need for wacky edge-case
>> features
>>> is minimal.  Call quality and reliability is the most important of
>> our
>>> concerns.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jonathan
>>> --
>>> This message was sent to: Jim Ray <jim at neuse.net>
>>> To unsubscribe, send a blank message to trilug-leave at trilug.org from
>> that address.
>>> TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
>>> Unsubscribe or edit options on the web    :
>> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/options/trilug/jim%40neuse.net
>>> TriLUG FAQ          :
>> http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions
>> --
>> This message was sent to: William <zhouwi at yahoo.com>
>> To unsubscribe, send a blank message to trilug-leave at trilug.org from
>> that address.
>> TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
>> Unsubscribe or edit options on the web    :
>> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/options/trilug/zhouwi%40yahoo.com
>> TriLUG FAQ          :
>> http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions
>> --
>> This message was sent to: Reginald Reed <reginald.reed at emc.com>
>> To unsubscribe, send a blank message to trilug-leave at trilug.org from
>> that address.
>> TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
>> Unsubscribe or edit options on the web    :
>> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/options/trilug/reginald.reed%40emc.com
>> TriLUG FAQ          :
>> http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions
> 
> -- 
> This message was sent to: Jim Ray <jim at neuse.net>
> To unsubscribe, send a blank message to trilug-leave at trilug.org from that address.
> TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> Unsubscribe or edit options on the web    : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/options/trilug/jim%40neuse.net
> TriLUG FAQ          : http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions