[TriLUG] Fwd: Sign this Petition - Explain why taxpayers pay out billions to Microsoft and get nothing in return, while Linux is free!

Linda Gardea linda.gardea at gmail.com
Tue May 7 15:28:20 EDT 2013


 2012 Coverity Open Source Scan Report was released today, showing linux
remains a benchmark of quality (this research was initially funded by
department of homeland security, but continued beyond their funding).  Here
is a link to get the report.

http://www.coverity.com/company/press-releases/read/annual-coverity-scan-report-finds-open-source-and-proprietary-software-quality-better-than-industry-average-for-second-consecutive-year

Key findings from the 2012 Coverity Scan Open Source Report include:

   - *Code quality for open source software continues to mirror that of
   proprietary software–and both continue to surpass the accepted industry
   standard for good software quality. *Defect density (defects per 1,000
   lines of software code) is a commonly used measurement for software
   quality. Coverity’s analysis found an average defect density of .69 for
   open source software projects that leverage the Coverity Scan service, and
   an average defect density of .68 for proprietary code developed by Coverity
   enterprise customers. Both have better quality as compared to the accepted
   industry standard defect density for good quality software of 1.0. This
   marks the second, consecutive year that both open source code and
   proprietary code scanned by Coverity have achieved defect density below 1.0.


   - *As projects surpass one million lines of code, there’s a direct
   correlation between size and quality for proprietary projects, and an
   inverse correlation for open source projects.* Proprietary code analyzed
   had an average defect density of .98 for projects between 500,000 –
   1,000,000 lines of code. For projects with more than one million lines of
   code, defect density decreased to .66, which suggests that proprietary
   projects generally experience an increase in software quality as they
   exceed that size. Open source projects with between 500,000 – 1,000,000
   lines of code, however, had an average defect density of .44, while that
   same figure increased to .75 for open source projects with more than one
   million lines of code, marking a decline in software quality as projects
   get larger. This discrepancy can be attributed to differing dynamics within
   open source and proprietary development teams, as well as the point at
   which these teams implement formalized development testing processes.


   - *Linux remains a benchmark for quality. *Since the original Coverity
   Scan report in 2008, scanned versions of Linux have consistently achieved a
   defect density of less than 1.0, and versions scanned in 2011 and 2012
   demonstrated a defect density below .7. In 2011, Coverity scanned more than
   6.8 million lines of Linux code and found a defect density of .62. In 2012,
   Coverity scanned more than 7.4 million lines of Linux code and found a
   defect density of .66. At the time of this report, Coverity scanned 7.6
   million lines of code in Linux 3.8 and found a defect density of .59.


   - *High-risk defects persist*. 36 percent of the defects fixed by the
   2012 Scan report were classified as “high-risk,” meaning that they could
   pose a considerable threat to overall software quality and security if
   undetected. Resource leaks, memory corruption and illegal memory access,
   all of which are considered difficult to detect without automated code
   analysis, were the most common high-risk defects identified in the report.



More information about the TriLUG mailing list