No subject

documentation for releases after a year, which I don't think is that big
a deal, you're still free to use it.

-Andrew  


On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 15:33, Chris Hedemark wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 01:22 PM, Mike Broome wrote:
> 
> > Here's an interesting article from The Register with commentary on Red
> > Hat's new position of supporting "consumer" OS releases for only 12
> > months.
> 
> Without going into detail, it has definitely gotten my attention (RH 
> enterprise entitlement customer).  I definitely plan on bringing it up 
> with my account manager.
> 
> I'm personally not happy with the idea that we're forced into using 
> RHAS if we don't want to have to do a major upgrade every year.  If I'm 
> reading this policy correctly, it would preclude me from deploying Red 
> Hat on desktops due to the rapid life cycle of their consumer releases 
> (and I'm not going to pay the $$$ for RHAS on the desktop).
> 
> No, I don't expect RH to support their products forever, but for 
> enterprise entitlement customers a few years wouldn't hurt.
> 
> Chris Hedemark .. Prospect Park, PA .. http://yonderway.com
> Homeland Security begins at home; support your Second Amendment.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TriLUG mailing list
>     http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> TriLUG Organizational FAQ:
>     http://www.trilug.org/~lovelace/faq/TriLUG-faq.html
>