[TriLUG] OT: lack of security at BofA
Joseph Mack NA3T
jmack at austintek.com
Sun Dec 21 18:10:25 EST 2014
On Sun, 21 Dec 2014, Justis Peters wrote:
> It's a calculated risk. They have budget assigned to cover the losses on
> fraud. Their bureaucracy adapts only when a pattern emerges which creates a
> risk of loss they can't afford to cover.
This is what I've heard too. The numbers show that fraud must cost them a lot.
BofA lost $1000 in an hour yesterday on my account. If BofA charges the vendor
2% (I don't know how much it is, but this will do for the moment. Assume a
spherical credit card). I will need to run 50k$ through this card for them to
make the money back. This will take me about 5yrs. BofA sends me a new card with
a new number about every year, because of fraudulent activity on my card. I
expect they're making a loss on me.
As Steve says, they should have got a bigger bailout.
Tim at Intrex says that people make cards up once they have your info. My card
has a chip in it, which is supposed to prevent duplication. However I find from
wikipedia that this chip is an alternative to the magnetic stripe rather than in
addition to the stripe and is not in common use in the US
Joe
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) austintek (dot) com - azimuthal equidistant
map generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list