[TriLUG] docker swarm, rancheros, persistent storage

[Brian Henning via TriLUG]

One of my work buddies drives a big orange Ranchero, but I don't know if that helps...

XD

-B

-----Original Message-----
From: TriLUG [mailto:trilug-bounces+bhenning=pineresearch.com at trilug.org] On Behalf Of Dewey Hylton via TriLUG
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2017 1:53 PM
To: Triangle Linux Users Group General Discussion <trilug at trilug.org>
Subject: [TriLUG] docker swarm, rancheros, persistent storage

Hi all!

What do you use for replicated or shared persistant volumes for your docker swarm containers?

Most folks who know me know that I'm a minimalist, sometimes (or most times) to a fault. I'm currently working with RancherOS for my Docker-based projects. I like it very much because it is very simple and stripped down - thus it fits me. I can install via PXE, it seems to run Docker very well, etc. It also works great in swarm mode. I happen to like swarm mode because it is baked into Docker, secure by default (as in its management traffic is secured by TLS), and it is very simple to get going - particularly when compared with Kubernetes.

Recently I have begun looking at moving some of my stateful containers into swarm mode for redundancy. The theory is pretty simple; move the stateful data into a named Docker volume which is accessible by all cluster nodes, and therefore all containers. For external databases and such this is not a big deal, but I have found this to be a pain point for simple shared files. For example, a moinmoin wiki leverages plain files instead of a database; another is the fossil cms, which can serve an entire directory of fossil repositories, which are stored on the filesystem as sqlite database files. All this works great in a Docker container, with data in a named volume - but I have yet to figure out how to make those directories and files available to containers on different hosts.

I have read that Kubernetes can provide those shared volumes somehow, but I'd really like to find a decent way to do this without having to add so much complexity. I've attempted NFS mounts (docker volume create --opt type=nfs) and while the creation does not error out, and all swarm containers see the volume, the volume data does not seem to reflect the data on the nfs share at all. I've also attempted portworx, which sounds fantastic aside from its price tag for enterprise users, but I have failed to get it installed properly. It may be that both of these failures are somewhat due to the stripped-down nature of RancherOS. If anyone has any experience with this, particularly with RancherOS (not necessarily Rancher, though), I'd love to hear from you.

Even if you do not use RancherOS, and instead have a full installation of something else (eg. Ubuntu/CentOS) with docker installed atop of that - and you have figured out how to provide shared volumes across your swarm nodes - I would appreciate hearing from you as well. 

Thanks!
--
This message was sent to: Brian <bhenning at pineresearch.com> To unsubscribe, send a blank message to trilug-leave at trilug.org from that address.
TriLUG mailing list : https://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
Unsubscribe or edit options on the web	: https://www.trilug.org/mailman/options/trilug/bhenning%40pineresearch.com
Welcome to TriLUG: http://trilug.org/welcome