[TriLUG] Question About NFS Client Access Config

Lance A. Brown via TriLUG trilug at trilug.org
Wed Apr 10 09:27:44 EDT 2019


Why should iptables be considered cheating?  Defense in depth is a well regarded concept and adding
a layer of host based security is a common tactic in controlling access to resources on a server.
Seems rather like doing security with one hand tied behind your back.

--[Lance]

Scott Chilcote via TriLUG wrote on 4/10/2019 9:16 AM:
> Hi All,
> 
> Thanks for the great help and ideas on this! 
> 
> We did think of the iptables solution, and patched that in last night. 
> But as Joe Mack pointed out that's considered cheating, and our host
> does not generally condone filtering inside the VLAN.  We'll see whether
> that holds.
> 
> The scan result is very specific that "At least one of the NFS shares
> exported by the remote server could be mounted by the scanning host." 
> That's a serious WTF finding, no?  We will likely get Redhat support
> involved.
> 
> Much appreciation!
> 
>    Scott C.


More information about the TriLUG mailing list