[TriLUG] anyone using Meshtastic?

Tadd Torborg via TriLUG trilug at trilug.org
Tue Jun 24 16:52:29 EDT 2025


The Meshtastic unit is in my hamshack, about 90 feet of LMR400 from the antenna. 
I use bluetooth to get to it from my iphone.  

https://torborg.com/tower-dec2024-img7835.jpg


Tadd / KA2DEW  https://qrz.com/db/ka2dew
tadd at mac.com
Raleigh NC  FM05pv

North Carolina ham-radio chatRoom Network: https://ncpacket.net/north_carolina_packet_radio_network.html <http://ncpacket.net/north_carolina_packet_radio_network.html>
Packet networking over ham radio: https://tarpn.net/t/packet_radio_networking.html <http://tarpn.net/t/packet_radio_networking.html>
Local Raleigh ham radio info: http://torborg.com/a



> On Jun 24, 2025, at 14:29, Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack at trilug.org> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2025, Tadd Torborg wrote:
> 
>> 10 elements in 915Mhz.
> 
> so you have the LoRa up on the tower and you wifi to it?
> 
>> 80m 10 elements would be hard to do.   Fun, maybe, ?  ha
> 
> it would be a great antenna. Of course it would have to be a couple of wavelengths above the ground.
> 
>> We need some high sites.  It would also be good to have a polling or token-passing protocol.  We?re sharing a channel with an unspecified number of emitters, and many of those will relay messages they hear. This creates channel congestion/collisions.
> 
> they need a routing protocol. Then most of the traffic would be routing messages.
> 
>> The max observed throughput is going to be orders of magnitude below the modem bitrate. Tadd ? KA2DEW
> 
> I see
> 
> Joe
> 
> -- 
> Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
> Don't upgrade a working machine - it won't work any
> better - it could work worse; it may not work at all.
> Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
> 



More information about the TriLUG mailing list