[TriLUG] anyone using Meshtastic?
Tadd Torborg via TriLUG
trilug at trilug.org
Tue Jun 24 16:52:29 EDT 2025
The Meshtastic unit is in my hamshack, about 90 feet of LMR400 from the antenna.
I use bluetooth to get to it from my iphone.
https://torborg.com/tower-dec2024-img7835.jpg
Tadd / KA2DEW https://qrz.com/db/ka2dew
tadd at mac.com
Raleigh NC FM05pv
North Carolina ham-radio chatRoom Network: https://ncpacket.net/north_carolina_packet_radio_network.html <http://ncpacket.net/north_carolina_packet_radio_network.html>
Packet networking over ham radio: https://tarpn.net/t/packet_radio_networking.html <http://tarpn.net/t/packet_radio_networking.html>
Local Raleigh ham radio info: http://torborg.com/a
> On Jun 24, 2025, at 14:29, Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack at trilug.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2025, Tadd Torborg wrote:
>
>> 10 elements in 915Mhz.
>
> so you have the LoRa up on the tower and you wifi to it?
>
>> 80m 10 elements would be hard to do. Fun, maybe, ? ha
>
> it would be a great antenna. Of course it would have to be a couple of wavelengths above the ground.
>
>> We need some high sites. It would also be good to have a polling or token-passing protocol. We?re sharing a channel with an unspecified number of emitters, and many of those will relay messages they hear. This creates channel congestion/collisions.
>
> they need a routing protocol. Then most of the traffic would be routing messages.
>
>> The max observed throughput is going to be orders of magnitude below the modem bitrate. Tadd ? KA2DEW
>
> I see
>
> Joe
>
> --
> Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
> Don't upgrade a working machine - it won't work any
> better - it could work worse; it may not work at all.
> Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
>
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list