16:31:28 #startmeeting 16:31:28 Meeting started Wed Aug 26 16:31:28 2015 UTC. The chair is whippythellama. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:31:28 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 16:31:45 #chairs eronel leafstorm jackhill mhrivnak whippythellama 16:31:58 #topic Hack Night Recap 16:32:09 not much happened, but it was fun! 16:32:14 agreed :) 16:32:18 about 6-8 people? 16:32:21 we had 6-9 people there 16:32:29 yep, that :) 16:32:43 Scott had a number posted, so everyone got in OK 16:32:44 cool 16:32:52 folks hacking on personal projects and whatnot 16:33:09 nothing earth-shattering, but a good time was had by all 16:33:44 so not much by way of a recap, really - any other questions or comments? :) 16:33:57 none here 16:33:59 do we want to try splatspace for the next? (assuming member availability, of course) 16:34:07 leafstorm: i would say likely so 16:34:12 sounds good to me. 16:34:15 this one was supposed to be, iirc 16:34:27 as of now, I'm available 16:34:31 sounds good. 16:34:35 it was just logistically far easier to do it at bandwidth this month 16:34:40 ok, cool 16:34:46 #topic September Meeting 16:34:47 I'm here 16:34:54 welcome, eronel! :) 16:35:05 mhrivnak: where are we with the september meeting plans? 16:35:49 I'm available for the next hack night as well 16:36:04 I am close to a commitment from a red hat engineering recruiter to be on the mini-panel. I sent an email this morning to get the firm commitment. 16:36:14 My intro presentation is ready to go. 16:36:23 woot! 16:36:25 mhrivnak: do you need anyone else for the mini panel? Someone from a university? 16:36:26 I now need one or two others for the panel. 16:36:40 what qualifications are you looking for? 16:36:57 jackhill, I saw your suggestion from earlier. That could work, but I'd like to just hear a little more about that person and what they could contribute. 16:37:10 I'm looking for people directly involved in the hiring process of engineers. 16:37:12 mhrivnak: offline or now? 16:37:27 I'm especially interested in getting someone from a small company. 16:37:37 jackhill, offline probably makes sense. 16:37:38 I can see if Caktus Group would be interested 16:37:42 mhrivnak: okay 16:37:46 Caktus+1 16:37:48 they're small and very open source 16:37:49 leafstorm, that could be great. 16:38:00 do you have contacts there? 16:38:12 a couple 16:38:28 I do think that the perspective from acadaemia is important. 16:38:34 leafstorm, ok let's proceed with that post-meeting. 16:38:47 eronel: good point 16:38:53 jackhill and eronel I'm also interested in how and why the academia perspective is different/important. :) 16:39:26 very large institution, with open-sourcey pockets in a generally enterprisey culture 16:39:35 tl;dr have a primary focus that is not the bottom line 16:39:40 also publicly funded, which is different 16:39:48 leafstorm: not necessarily 16:39:48 hm...any nonprofits relevant? 16:40:26 good points. 16:40:37 mhrivnak: what's the major theme for september? like the working title or such? 16:40:38 I can't think of any that hire software developers right offhand... 16:41:08 leafstorm: Wikimedia? 16:41:13 I can't speak for NCSU, but Duke and UNC certainly hire developers. 16:41:20 NCSU definitely does 16:41:25 Trade associations are non-profits and hire lots of developers 16:41:28 I have contacts there, but if yall would like to stick with Duke 16:41:52 whippythellama, haven't thought about it. Got back from vacation last night, and I'll get a title and descreption together by the end of this week. :) 16:42:01 I think Tim would be pretty good and I'll send an email later. Disclaimer: I work for him. 16:42:13 sure, sure - all i was shooting for was a general focus 16:42:19 mhrivnak: cool. if you could post that, the description, and an outline of your talk to steering@, that would be nice. 16:42:20 large nonprofits are similar to large for-profits. many have software and systems engineers. 16:42:46 i have this sort of venn-like picture of engineering + open source + something career-y, but not much more resolved than that 16:42:54 in the mean time, jackhill and eronel can one or both of you send me some info on who you have in mind and what his/her involvement is with hiring at Duke? 16:43:23 mhrivnak: sure 16:43:28 and leafstorm let's talk about your contacts at caktus and see if I can get in touch with a recruiter or hiring manager. 16:43:37 #action jackhill follow up with info about Tim for mhrivnak 16:43:39 preferably a hiring manager. 16:43:58 OK 16:44:36 leafstorm, eronel - are there actions there you need to call out? 16:44:54 #action leafstorm contact Caktus Group about panelist 16:45:36 ok, are there any items besides panelists you need any help with, mhrivnak? 16:45:43 nope. 16:45:58 ok, cool - so beyond that, we're on target for september? 16:46:21 yep. 16:46:27 awesome :) 16:46:36 ok, moving along... 16:46:38 #topic Moya 16:47:07 jackhill: i know you're just back 16:47:34 what's the next action on the moya front? is it rescheduling the racking activities? 16:47:35 no change from pre-vacation. I need to follow up with Nivex (it looks like he'll be the one). 16:47:41 ok, cool 16:47:46 do you need any help on that? 16:48:08 not yet 16:48:51 ok, let us know if you do - thanks again for leading on that 16:49:08 okay, will do 16:49:16 anything else you need in the meantime? 16:49:40 nope 16:49:46 coolio 16:49:50 #topic All Things Open 16:50:19 ok, we have an offer of our first oh-fish-ul post-501(c)3 donation 16:50:24 woo hoo! :) 16:50:26 woot! 16:50:39 mhrivnak: did you catch the email thread? 16:51:04 I did. 16:51:15 I think that sounds great. 16:51:35 I think I missed the email thread. What did we get? 16:51:38 awesome; do you think you'll have time to follow up with him on the whole donation thing? 16:51:51 offer of $350 16:52:08 very cool 16:52:12 ...wait, should I have said that out loud? 16:52:17 yep, that sounds fine to me. It's in excess of our usual $300 request, so I think we should accept it and give them the usual sponsor privileges. 16:52:34 i don't think it's out of order to specify the donation 16:52:37 ^^ leafstorm 16:52:50 mhrivnak: that was my thought too 16:53:11 the only difference is that now we can send a follow-up letter certifying that we received the charitable donation, which they can use as proof of the donation. 16:53:25 yeah, i was going to ask you about that 16:53:56 now that we're an actual charitable organization, do we need a process and/or forms for that? 16:54:13 we do, but it's simple. 16:54:40 we need a form letter where we can drop in a date, name, address, and dollar amount. 16:54:56 Then someone needs to fill it out, sign it, and get it to the donor. 16:55:07 That's usually done by the treasurer, so I'm happy to take care of it. 16:55:22 that's great - thank you! 16:55:41 I'll follow up with Todd Lewis about handling the exchange. 16:55:49 thank you again, mhrivnak :) 16:56:16 let me know if you need help with the letter 16:56:35 that should be up on the gdrive, too 16:56:47 indeed. I'll share it there. 16:57:12 do we want to try to have a presence at all things open? 16:57:14 we'll also need to add them to the Sponsors page on the site 16:57:25 what is "a presence"? 16:57:25 leafstorm: very good idea 16:57:37 a table or the like 16:58:02 good question. If we have someone available to be at such a table, then perhaps yes. 16:58:04 I will probably not be able to get off work for it 16:58:19 but I suspect the availability will be the limiting factor. 16:58:20 I'll be there, but Duke is sending me, so I'm not sure I could man a table. 16:58:30 I won't be able to attend. 16:58:32 yeah, i'm not certain if i'll be able to be there yet either 16:58:52 poll the membership? 16:59:13 it's sounding like that might be the best way to go 16:59:40 before we ask for volunteers, we should define the request. What would they do? Will we provide some materials? A banner? Hand-outs? What's the message? 16:59:48 I wouldn't think most people would want to take the time away from going to the sessisons. 17:00:54 agreed 17:00:56 on both points 17:00:56 yeah, what would we get out of it. Do we know how many of the people attending are local? 17:01:05 the time is 13:00 17:01:12 I think it's generally a good idea to be present at events like this with some info about the LUG, but I think we have work to do in order to be prepared for it. 17:01:15 jackhill: yep, i was just about to mention that 17:01:27 mhrivnak: agreed 17:01:41 ok, i have to stop nowish 17:01:57 we should continue the discussion on-list, if folks have ideas 17:02:03 same for Oct meeting? 17:02:09 There is also the Google Dev Group thing coming up soon, which could be better for us. 17:02:25 sounds good. 17:02:26 agreed, jackhill 17:02:38 jackhill: devfestnc? 17:02:43 yeah. 17:02:53 gotta go 17:02:56 likewise 17:02:58 thanks everyone! 17:03:00 #endmeeting