17:02:48 #startmeeting 17:02:48 Meeting started Tue Jun 14 17:02:48 2016 UTC. The chair is whippythellama. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:02:48 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 17:02:58 #chair mhrivnak qqx stmiller whippythellama 17:02:58 Current chairs: mhrivnak qqx stmiller whippythellama 17:03:07 #topic Agenda Additions 17:03:15 anyone have anything to add? 17:03:28 don't think so. 17:03:31 back 17:03:32 * mhrivnak pulls up the agenda 17:03:39 welcome back, stmiller :) 17:03:53 agenda LGTM 17:04:06 ... 17:04:10 I have a little bit about the mailman config 17:04:18 Possibly falls under site configuration 17:04:30 mhrivnak: had to look that acronym up :) 17:04:36 heh 17:04:44 qqx: sounds good 17:05:01 ok, if there's nothing else to add - onward... 17:05:08 #topic June Meeting Recap 17:05:25 thanks for mailing out the count, mhrivnak - i counted the same 17:05:48 Was that not counting the presenters? 17:05:51 i thought their presentation was very cool - loved the flashy blinky demo :) 17:05:59 qqx: honestly, i don't recall :) 17:06:14 I think my count did not include the presenters. 17:06:18 From my count it wasn't, I counted with them and got 2 more. 17:06:24 also +1 to the presentation. 17:07:08 it was still a bit leaner numbers-wise than i expected, though 17:07:11 as you noted, mhrivnak 17:07:20 I did see at least 10 regulars at SELF the next day. 17:07:28 So I think Jeremy was right that SELF was a factor. 17:07:30 yeah, i thought jeremy made a good point about that 17:08:05 we'll have to see how the rpi numbers work out 17:08:33 alan suggested we look into moving back to the ncsu eng buildings 17:08:48 i'm going to email an old contact there and see if that's feasible 17:09:07 #action whippythellama email ncsu about moving the meetings back there 17:09:31 that being said, if anyone has alternative suggestions, i'm all ears 17:09:41 we're at least set for july 17:10:17 anything else about the june meeting? 17:10:20 There was jackhill's suggestion of the Durham County Library 17:10:29 missed that one 17:10:44 did you want to find out about it? 17:10:54 They do have a $25 fee for meetings that have food 17:10:58 aah 17:11:23 still possible, but a little less desirable 17:12:11 if that's a good candidate location, we could use some details 17:12:14 sorry, PM showed up at my desk wanting to chat. :) 17:12:17 * mhrivnak is back 17:12:48 Lexis Nexis is still an idea worth pursuing. 17:12:55 At least to inquire and see if it's an option. 17:13:01 specific location, times available, size of room, openness of wifi, cost(s), any nearby 'bada'-type places for trichug, etc 17:13:12 as a reminder, that's the building we used to meet in when it was Red Hat. 17:13:14 mhrivnak: someone mentioned they had a contact there, i thought 17:13:30 stmiller: didn't you say you thought you knew someone? 17:13:42 mhrivnak: i remember - that was a good room 17:13:53 Caktus - I think it's a small space. Waiting to hear back from their mgmt 17:14:03 stmiller: awesome, thank you! 17:14:07 Yes. We could also ask on the email list, and might get one or two contacts through there. 17:14:13 We did a couple years ago last time we asked. 17:14:20 Which was before they moved in. 17:14:32 also, PM might drive-by again... 17:14:36 heh 17:14:45 So sorry if I stop responding suddenly. 17:15:06 * whippythellama prepares to heap bunches of actions on mhrivnak in his absence 17:15:12 heh 17:15:12 bwuahahahahaaa 17:16:16 i can email the group about lexis nexus as well, unless someone wants to take that one 17:16:26 welcome, jeremyhwllc :) 17:16:29 #chair jeremyhwllc 17:16:29 Current chairs: jeremyhwllc mhrivnak qqx stmiller whippythellama 17:16:47 I am a little worried about moving the regular meeting too far from its historic location. Frontier will be a good experiment. 17:16:58 mhrivnak: agreed 17:17:19 ncsu campus is fairly central to the area 17:17:56 Depends what you define as "the area" 17:18:17 Raleigh LUG 17:18:17 Oh, here's a quick idea that just hit me- anyone have contact with Celito? That might be a good hack night location. 17:18:18 #action whippythellama email group and see about lexis nexus contact(s) 17:18:35 mhrivnak: not familiar with them 17:18:43 Very central, and the guy who runs it (I forget how to spell his name, so I won't try) seems very approachable and community involved. 17:18:45 and since we're moving in that direction, topic-wise 17:18:47 ... 17:18:49 small data center operation. 17:18:54 #topic June Hack Night 17:18:57 located near PNC center 17:19:13 oh, cool - that sounds promising 17:19:16 I'm pretty sure they have a conference room that would work. 17:19:30 any idea how to get in touch with him/them? 17:20:09 i've reached out to my contact at webassign again - he's booked this week once again, but he's talking to the appdev folks today to see if anyone can host hack night there this month 17:20:13 I think there's a chance meta metrics uses them. stmiller do you know? 17:21:02 Yes MetaMetrics uses Celito, for voip provider. And small server there. I've only been there once, just to the datacenter part 17:21:07 The best option is to find a current celito customer who already has building access to run it by them. 17:21:21 I know for sure that the wifi is good there. ;) 17:21:31 heh - nice :) 17:21:40 It's easy to get to off of the wade ave. extension. 17:21:54 quiet, great wifi, etc. 17:22:08 awesome - do you have time to chase that down further? 17:22:21 Not sure of the space, have to find out how many peeps that can take 17:22:29 Perhaps stmiller and I can chat more about it, and maybe he'll be in a position to ask about it soon. 17:22:43 that would be great :) 17:23:02 so that's sounding like a 'future location' type discussion, rather than 'two days from now' 17:23:04 yes? 17:23:14 yes 17:23:34 ok, just making sure i had the expectations right :) 17:23:55 so other than webassign (still waiting to hear) - other suggestions for thursday? 17:24:09 jackhill indicated that splatspace is already booked that night 17:24:36 ...and from what he said last week, it sounds like it may be booked for the forseeable future on 3rd thursdays 17:24:53 (jackhill - please correct me if i'm off on that) 17:24:53 I still am up for reconsidering the time/date of hack night as well at a future discussion 17:25:05 whippythellama: sounds right to me 17:25:23 agreed - i picked 3rd thursdays because it minimized the conflict with other meetups in the area 17:25:29 Good point. If we could do splatspace a different night in the near future, perhaps that would be fine. 17:25:37 i subscribed to about two dozen calendars looking for a decent day :) 17:25:40 Thurs is meetup night in the triangle 17:26:03 i am absolutely open for moving it 17:26:23 * mhrivnak notes the time and has a meeting at 1:30 17:26:25 we just need to do the digging to make sure there aren't any major recurring conflicts 17:26:31 noted, mhrivnak 17:27:08 ok, please, Please, PLEASE everyone try to think of another possible location for thursday - we need to get that settled asap 17:27:31 as in this thursday - we can figure out the bigger scheduling question later 17:27:36 raleigh brewing has a conference room, but requires $200 tab minimum 17:27:36 in the interest of time... 17:27:44 #topic Site Configuration 17:27:53 qqx: you had something you wanted to chat about? 17:28:00 sorry for the short time on that 17:28:17 Yeah, I'd like to enable VERP in mailman 17:28:31 unfamiliar with that 17:28:31 To help with dealing with undeliverable messages 17:28:54 It encodes the recipient address in the envelope sender for each message 17:29:07 aaaah - that would be LOVELY 17:29:12 * mhrivnak has to run. 17:29:13 It's not enabled by default, since needing to send to each recipient separately can increase the load. 17:29:14 +1 17:29:22 thank you, mhrivnak! 17:29:39 But we already add a personalized footer on all the lists we serve, so w're already needing to do that. 17:29:50 oh, excellent 17:29:58 so there's likely not much additional overhead 17:30:07 Right. 17:30:14 as long as you watch the load on the server, i'd say go for it! 17:30:27 there's at least one bouncing address i am dying to track down 17:30:45 Probably need to send an announcement to the lists, so that anyone filtering on the envelope sender would have some advance notice. 17:30:55 very good idea 17:31:13 At least the lists that actually have traffic 17:31:23 yeah, there is that :) 17:31:28 There are a few on there that don't seem to have any activity for years 17:31:44 uh huh; we could probably stand a list audit 17:32:11 ok, we're now a couple of minutes over 17:32:34 qqx: want to take an action on the VERP thing? 17:33:10 #action qqx Enable VERP in mailman after announcing to lists 17:33:15 woot 17:33:17 thankee :) 17:33:27 ...ok, time 17:33:33 #topic General Business 17:33:46 anything urgent any of you need to cover before we break? 17:33:59 Nothing here 17:34:07 Nothing here 17:34:11 ok, cool 17:34:17 thank you! 17:34:19 #endmeeting