17:29:46 #startmeeting 17:29:46 Meeting started Mon Aug 22 17:29:46 2016 UTC. The chair is whippythellama. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:29:46 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 17:29:55 #chair stmiller qqx mhrivnak whippythellama 17:29:55 Current chairs: mhrivnak qqx stmiller whippythellama 17:30:03 #topic Agenda Additions 17:30:10 Nothing here 17:30:17 i have some 17:30:32 the 'business talk 360' email 17:30:44 the tritux for the donation 17:30:47 nothing here. 17:31:10 and the sponsorship slide jeremy mentioned in his email for all things open 17:31:40 stmiller: you got anything? 17:32:02 Only thing is we should update the non-profit page on the website. Looks out of date. I'll find a link 17:32:12 ok, cool 17:32:28 #topic August Hack Night Recap 17:32:38 qqx was the only one who showed up, as it turns out 17:32:46 oh bummer 17:32:47 i was there online, but $work went late that night 17:32:52 yeah 17:33:03 i thought we had some rsvps, but apparently not 17:33:24 so he and i chatted briefly, but that was mostly it 17:33:33 Maybe when there's no explicit topic, we should try doing them virtually? 17:33:36 qqx: anything to add? 17:33:49 good possibility, yeah 17:33:55 Even without any other RSVPs, I think it was good to have somebody there, since we don't generally require RSVP. 17:34:05 qqx: good point 17:35:05 But, yeah it might be good to do it online only in cases like that. 17:35:23 yeah, unless we have our speaker there for a workshop on that month's topic, for example 17:35:59 Let's see then if any Amazon folks want to come to next month's hack night, and plan accordingly. 17:36:22 and add a note to the invite mentioning that if anyone wants to hack together, we can arrange the space 17:36:31 sounds like a good plan 17:37:12 not much else to say about the event this month, really :) 17:37:17 moving on 17:37:23 #topic September Meeting 17:37:33 What do you all think about the proposed summary? 17:37:52 mhrivnak: i'd have to go look for it - when was that sent? 17:37:56 Looks good to me, but I can request/suggest modifications. 17:37:57 sorry, lost track of it 17:37:58 steering@ 17:38:06 Aug 16 17:38:18 * whippythellama goes to look 17:38:41 1:54 pm is looks like 17:38:49 from Brian Beach 17:39:05 "This session will introduce Amazon Web Services (AWS) for Linux engineers. During this one and half hour session we will build a web scale application from the ground up on AWS. We will begin with an introduction to Amazon Linux. Then we will examine a few options to deploy and configure an application in the Cloud. Next we will add a load balancer and auto scaling to dynamically add and remove capacity in response to 17:39:05 load. Finally, we will externalize static content and add a CDN to take load off our application." 17:39:09 Some of those went to my gmail spam for some reason 17:39:20 perfect 17:39:48 yeah, i'll look again after the meeting, but i didn't see that at first 17:39:57 i suspect the spam filter as well 17:40:01 mhrivnak: that sounds great 17:40:05 do we have a bio? 17:40:08 yep 17:40:11 excellent 17:40:17 then i think we're good 17:40:25 we need the site and meetup updated 17:40:28 I just forwarded to steering@ 17:40:34 if you want to take meetup, i'll do the site 17:40:42 I was just typing the same proposal. ;) 17:40:51 lol 17:40:59 great minds and such :) 17:41:08 He said we can just grab any amazon logo we want. 17:41:10 #action whippythellama update the site for september 17:41:19 and to be clear, they are also sponsoring the meeting. 17:41:34 #action mhrivnak update meetup.com for Sept main meeting 17:41:37 lol... he should be careful about saying such things, my mind is not normal with words like "any" 17:42:11 when should we send the first announcements? 17:42:27 i'm thinking this week, personally 17:42:35 we're about two weeks out 17:42:35 Ya, I'm thinking ASAP. 17:42:57 ok 17:43:03 As soon as you get the website updated and I have meetup updated, I'll hit the "announce" button on meetup. 17:43:23 ok, cool - thanks! 17:43:38 i think we should also still hit the discussion and announce lists, tho 17:43:59 i can do that bit 17:44:19 unless someone else wants to - if it's me, it's more or less copy pasta from the page on the site :) 17:44:51 definitely. 17:45:12 #action whippythellama send out announcements for september 17:45:12 This'll be another good one to cross-promote. 17:45:16 yep 17:45:30 i'll ping jeremy and see if he can take care of that for us 17:45:43 #action whippythellama ping jeremyhwllc about cross-promotion 17:45:52 ok, anything else for next month? 17:46:11 nothing here. is the hdmi cable a separate item? 17:46:18 yep 17:46:22 coming up next 17:46:27 we have the issue of which room to use 17:46:28 Nothing here 17:46:35 but I think that depended on the cable situation. 17:46:51 gotcha 17:46:51 Possible additional place to notify about the meeting: https://www.meetup.com/Triangle-AWS-Amazon-Web-Services-Meetup/events/232973465/ 17:47:02 good point, qqx 17:47:31 want to let jeremy know about that, or ping them? 17:47:55 I'm thinking that I might be going to that. 17:47:55 ah, wait 17:48:20 oh cool! 17:48:28 Nice and convenient, since it's in the building where I work. 17:48:30 want to talk to them when you're there? 17:48:36 wow, yeah, i'd say 17:49:07 Yeah, I can talk with them. 17:49:13 excellent, thanks! 17:49:20 can you action that? 17:49:35 i'm going to go ahead and push on 17:49:43 #topic Actions, etc 17:49:46 #action qqx Talk with people from Triange AWS meetup about next meeting. 17:50:09 jeremy already indicated in his email that he intends to follow up on the feedback form items 17:50:22 as far as the hdmi cable goes 17:50:33 i want to get a 100' cable 17:50:49 that should be long enough for just about any room 17:51:02 it looks like it will cost about $60-70 or so 17:51:31 they're active, meaning there's a booster 17:51:39 needed to ensure good signal quality 17:51:49 thoughts? 17:52:00 I assume that's for a reasonably good-quality cable, and not the bargain variety? 17:52:04 yep 17:52:17 nice. 17:52:20 i only want something that should hold us for a while 17:52:24 I vote we do it. 17:52:24 Yeah, that's probably long enough 17:52:37 i think a 100' cable should suffice for the forseeable future 17:52:50 I'd say go for it. 17:52:56 and i'm only looking at ones that have a LOT of positive reviews 17:53:21 ok, i'll grab one of the ones i've found 17:53:32 There is also wireless hdmi 17:53:34 mhrivnak: should i email you a copy of the receipt? 17:53:38 whippythellama, yep 17:53:39 Audio is hit and miss though with those 17:53:44 stmiller: ah 17:53:49 yeah, i'd say that kills it for me 17:54:02 i want rock solid 17:54:37 qqx: any updates on moya? 17:55:03 I got haproxy working for http sites. 17:55:13 Still needs work for https. 17:55:29 cool! thanks! :) 17:55:54 Either I need to figure out a decent way to get the certificates setup with haproxy, or use something else. 17:56:01 where are we with updates, data refresh, etc? 17:56:12 Considering using https://github.com/dlundquist/sniproxy instead. 17:56:24 yeah, you mentioned that one 17:56:35 Still need to do updates of the data. 17:56:41 ok 17:57:15 did you want some help on those lines? 17:57:33 I think I should be able to handle things. 17:57:39 i just want to be sure we're moving toward getting moya swapped in for pilot 17:57:45 ok, cool 17:57:53 The use of etckeeper should be a big help, allowing me to figure out what changes have been done on the VM. 17:58:03 excellent! 17:58:38 let us know if there's anything you need/want help with, or put out a call for volunteers :) 17:58:47 ok, we're short on time (per usual), so... 17:58:49 OK. 17:59:06 we'll lump the rest into general business 17:59:09 #topic General Business 17:59:24 so we're about to empty our topic queue 17:59:35 we need to get something lined up for october 18:00:19 something to think on - we all need to try to find new topics 18:00:44 i think we already did lightning talks this year, iirc 18:00:44 I can see if one of the bandwidth persons want to talk about RHEV / ovirt maybe. Not sure if that is of interest? 18:01:02 that sounds interesting, sure! 18:01:09 see what you can drum up : ) 18:01:19 I saw part of a killer microservices talk today that might be a good candidate for the future. 18:02:03 Only "problem" is it's a bit heavy on using kubernetes/openshift, and I don't want to over-saturate on those topics. 18:02:07 on the 'business talk 360' email, i'm leaning toward 'no' - it just feels kinda spammy, and i don't think we'd really get much value out of exposure like that 18:02:32 agreed, it looks very spammy, and I'm anticipating they'll want us to pay. 18:02:34 mhrivnak: good one to note 18:02:44 yeah, it does look that way 18:02:45 I viewed that as complete spam. 18:02:59 It was pretty clear to me that they were expecting payment. 18:03:12 yeah, i think we can go ahead and pass on it 18:03:39 ok, so jeremy mentioned a tritux for the big pizza donation 18:03:53 i think i recall you saying the donor didn't want recognition, mhrivnak? 18:04:09 That's good. We do need to confirm if he wants public recognition. I don't know one way or the other. 18:04:33 He made an equal donation at the end of 2015 FWIW. 18:04:42 ok, i thought there was something like that, but i may be wrong there 18:05:02 can you follow up with him and jeremy and figure it out? 18:05:13 Sure thing. 18:05:40 the only other thing that caught my attention was that you had confirmed the non-receipt of goods or services in return for the donation 18:05:40 #action mhrivnak work with Jeremy to see about thanking the recent donor. 18:05:50 so i wasn't sure if a tritux would violate that somehow 18:05:58 thanks :) 18:06:20 stmiller: you had something to add as well, i believe 18:06:24 the last thing from my side 18:06:35 and i'm trying to get this done quick - i know we're over 18:06:40 Oh, is this still good: http://trilug.org/articlesofincorporation 18:06:44 re: non-profit stuff? 18:06:48 is the all things open acknowledgement in a slide 18:07:00 i'd have to look, stmiller 18:07:14 i think jeremy's proposal to add a slide is a good one 18:07:33 stmiller, that does look current on first glance. 18:07:35 i'm thinking that maybe a "donor slide" or the like? 18:07:43 for donors over a certain amount 18:07:51 stmiller, I think it used to have a lot more stuff before we moved things into the new bylaws. 18:07:57 to be kept in the deck for a month or two past the donation date 18:08:41 I have mixed feelings about a donor slide, since its such an infrequent event. 18:08:42 so if you donate, or sponsor, you get shown/mentioned in the announcements for a month or two 18:09:08 just for a month or two, not 'so-and-so donated in 2009' :) 18:09:09 As long as that is clear and expectations are set 18:09:16 heh 18:09:37 ok, i'll take that one to email 18:09:43 we can discuss further there 18:09:43 What about going back to having a general "thank you" slide? 18:09:51 we definitely should 18:09:55 that can include donations, volunteerism, etc. 18:10:12 yes, absolutely 18:10:18 ok, we are *way* over now 18:10:22 sorry about that 18:10:43 if there's anything else, we should take it to email 18:10:49 thanks, guys! 18:10:51 #endmeeting