18:30:12 #startmeeting 18:30:12 Meeting started Mon Jan 23 18:30:12 2017 UTC. The chair is whippythellama. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:30:12 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 18:30:19 #chair jeremyhwllc stmiller mhrivnak qqx whippythellama 18:30:19 Current chairs: jeremyhwllc mhrivnak qqx stmiller whippythellama 18:30:29 #topic Check for Agenda Additions 18:30:35 anyone have anything to add to the schedule? 18:30:42 Nothing here. 18:30:45 not I 18:30:55 none 18:31:09 nothing here 18:31:14 ok, coolio 18:31:27 #topic January Hack Night Recap / General Hack Night Discussion 18:31:34 so that didn't happen 18:32:01 i intended to attend, but i'd forgotten my wife was going out of town 18:32:17 Yeah it was a mess. Sorry to qqx. I suppose we need to see what events are going on in the same area there in the future 18:32:18 so there were things that had to be done 18:32:32 Bummer it didn't work out. 18:32:37 yeah :/ 18:32:43 i was looking forward to it 18:33:02 I certainly agree with the sentiment of not holding these unless we can get a base level of interest expressed. 18:33:08 I think you were the only one, no responses on list or on irc. 18:33:10 i wonder whether this was mainly because of the parking situation this time 18:33:21 mhrivnak: agreed 18:33:41 To me the parking situation didn't seem much different than normal. 18:33:45 no? 18:33:59 three non-SC people RSVP'd 18:34:41 I couldn't find any spots driving around for 15 minutes or so, saw huge lines of persons going to the durham theater 18:34:48 yeah, that's what had me wondering if maybe congestion affected the attendance 18:34:48 Didn't look much like anybody else showed up. 18:35:05 I hung around by the door until a few minutes after the start time, and didn't see anyone. 18:35:11 hmm... 18:35:41 it might be cool to team up with the TriPython group hack nights who meet at same location 18:35:59 they meet there and at webassign 18:36:17 i've gone to the one at webassign a few times - there are generally a dozen or so folks there at least 18:36:49 they do have pizza, tho, and the webassign snack bar/drink fridge 18:36:57 which doesn't hurt 18:37:08 i don't know how the ones at caktus go 18:37:29 I think trilug is a one-meeting a month type of crowd. It's hard enough to get the main monthly meeting organized 18:37:35 I'd support the idea of making sure that 1) each hack night has a well-defined theme/goal, as this recent one did. And 2) we cancel if we don't reach a minimum number of RSVPs 24h in advance. 18:37:39 heh.. true, stmiller 18:37:46 I'm not going to do hack nights anymore, 18:37:57 so any future ones, someone else can do it. Or just scrap it. 18:38:17 mhrivnak: i agree on your first point 18:38:35 we did have rsvps this time, tho, making me wonder how we can be somewhat certain 18:38:44 stmiller: i can totally understand that 18:38:55 you have put in more than your fair share of time on them 18:39:03 thank you for doing so! 18:39:04 I really can't commit to more than 1 night per month 18:39:21 meetup RSVPs are not very reliable on an individual basis, so I'd probably want to see 10+ before feeling confident that 4 will show up. 18:40:06 mhrivnak: i agree in spirit, but then we're faced with cancelling an event with, say, 6 rsvps or something 18:40:23 Yeah, the other option would be to have some type of sanction for people who RSVP but don't show. But no idea what that could be. 18:40:34 qqx: yeah, that's a bit of a challenge 18:40:40 Heh. The TriLUG wall of shame. 18:40:44 double the membership dues for them! 18:41:11 if it needs a vote I would support suspending hack nights until there is interest and/or demand 18:41:28 heh... rsvp and you're entered in the wall of shame, which goes public after hack night. the interface for removing yourself is only available on-site 18:41:34 bwuahhahaha 18:41:54 I would be very happy suspending this as a regular event, and only do one-offs when we think they really make sense and we can drum up a lot of interest. 18:42:00 mhrivnak: i agree 18:42:12 i think for some of our topics they will be well suited 18:42:31 i'm primarily thinking about when we can get the speaker to come back and lead a workshop type setup 18:42:45 right 18:42:50 That does somewhat add to the main meeting planning then. 18:42:50 I agree 18:43:02 qqx: only in some cases 18:43:08 Rather than being somewhat separate, and able to be delayed by a week. 18:43:19 ? 18:43:24 from the institutional memory: we used to do non-recurrent extra events on Saturday. We tried out the weekday thing because Saturday is suboptimal for some people and I observed that other groups (e.g. the now-defunct TA3M) had sucess with the weekday format. 18:43:25 sorry, i'm not sure what you mean 18:43:29 ^^ qqx 18:44:11 If we only want to do that when we can get the speaker back, we need to check on their availability and arrange for a location. 18:44:12 jackhill: gotcha; thanks :) 18:44:23 Ideally before the main meeting for both of those. 18:44:32 qqx: agreed 18:45:02 Not necessarily a big addition, but still something. 18:45:06 yeah, it is 18:45:07 yep. 18:45:28 I usually ask the speakers to lead a hack night. no takers this year 18:45:46 It's pretty early in the year. :) 18:45:47 The selinux speaker is interested in doing this. 18:46:02 to be fair, there are only some topics which are well suited for them 18:46:21 drones probably wouldn't be, for example, nor would sdr necessarily 18:46:51 both require additional hardware that most members probably don't have, and those that do may not need a hack night to get up and running with them 18:47:12 if the speaker is from out of town the hack night is unlikely 18:47:17 Or for things like that it might be good to have more than a week between the presentation and the hack night. 18:47:24 the selinux thing that mhrivnak just mentioned would, because really all you need is your linux laptop/vm 18:47:30 jeremyhwllc: agreed 18:47:39 qqx: very true 18:47:45 Allow the presentation to get people interested, then have time to order the hw. 18:47:48 or possibly on a weekend 18:48:55 In the interest of time, should we just agree that we'll suspend these as a regular event, and only bring them back for presenters who really want to do one, or other special occasions? 18:49:02 hardware requirements and hack night details used to be announced on the same post and promo email 18:49:02 so i'll go ahead and ask... 18:49:09 And we can consider them individually? 18:49:27 jeremyhwllc: definitely a good idea 18:49:47 do we all agree that we are going to suspend hack nights in their current incarnation? 18:49:55 that cuts down on announcements 18:49:58 any objections? 18:49:58 +1 18:50:00 whippythellama: agreed here 18:50:06 good with me :) 18:50:17 stmiller: i kind of figured ;) 18:50:24 and allows us more time to promote next meeting 18:50:24 jeremyhwllc: you? 18:50:42 i vote in favor 18:50:49 so for one-off hack nights / workshops 18:51:13 shall we just ask each speaker if they're willing and available to do it sometime in the same month they're speaking? 18:51:25 yes 18:51:35 Sure. 18:52:03 it will make for some additional logistics if they say yes, but assuming we get enough lead time it shouldn't be too onerous 18:52:23 Between the speaker and us, we should probably also consider if it makes sense. 18:52:30 qqx: absolutely 18:52:49 Agreed. A RHV/ovirt hack night would probably not work well. :) 18:52:55 So we wouldn't offer. 18:52:59 heh 18:53:01 we can probably use the frontier if needed for hack nights 18:53:08 Just bring your own netapp cluster, and servers, and you can setup rhv 18:53:11 jeremyhwllc: probably so - good point 18:53:20 exactly! 18:53:22 no problem 18:53:44 * mhrivnak has another meeting at 2 18:53:45 ok, i think we've probably sufficiently flogged the deceased equestrian mammal 18:53:48 The parking situation at the Frontier is definitely better, even compared to normal nights at Caktus. 18:54:00 #topic February Meeting 18:54:19 jeremyhwllc: have you received summaries and bios yet? 18:54:29 I plan to post Feb meeting details. contact second speaker for abstract and bio. promote to local groups. ask brian henning to print 2 blinky morse code TriTux for the speakers. and perhaps some small ones as well 18:54:32 Also, jeremyhwllc thanks for tracking down more speakers! 18:54:41 +1 18:54:46 +` 18:54:49 er 18:54:51 +1 18:54:53 that 18:54:59 :-) 18:55:03 jeremyhwllc: awesome, thank you! 18:55:25 good intentions to do it tonight 18:55:27 woot 18:55:31 sweet 18:55:51 ok, since we went long on the hack night discussion let's move on 18:55:57 thank you again, jeremyhwllc :) 18:56:11 #topic Future Topics 18:56:26 mhrivnak: looks like selinux is on track for march, yes? 18:56:30 yes. 18:56:35 excellent 18:56:51 awesome 18:56:52 you mentioned a hack night along with it? 18:57:07 Yes, the speaker wants to do a workshop. 18:57:21 stmiller: thank you for chasing down the serverless django+aws talk 18:57:25 sweet 18:57:35 yeah! It will be an awesome talk 18:57:54 does he think he can fit it into a two hour window, or did he want to do something longer on a saturday or something? 18:58:05 stmiller: i'm definitely looking forward to it :) 18:58:16 I think 2 hours of selinux is enough for anyone. ;) 18:58:19 lol 18:58:21 fair enough 18:58:39 I'll ask. I think it will fit within a regular meeting. Can demo launching a site serverless, show aws console, some lambda code, and more. 18:59:15 heh... that question was actually to mhrivnak about the hack night, but good to know :) 18:59:37 ok, time running short 18:59:43 #topic General Business 18:59:54 we still need to figure out the os upgrade on pilot 19:00:11 but not today 19:00:16 Gotta go. I'll catch up with you all later. 19:00:22 anyone have anything else they need to talk about? 19:00:27 ok, thank you mhrivnak 19:00:28 Nope 19:00:31 nothing 19:00:37 notta 19:00:52 alrighty then.... on that note... 19:00:55 #endmeeting